Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 29;74(740):137-139.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736677. Print 2024 Mar.

Is the digital rectal exam any good as a prostate cancer screening test?

Mike Kirby  1 , Samuel Wd Merriel  2 , Oluwabunmi Olajide  3 , Alexander Norman  4 , Nikhil Vasdev  5 , Vishwanath Hanchanale  6 , Michelle Cain  7 , Malcolm Wilkinson  8 , Harley Stephens  9 , Deborah Victor  10 , William Kinnaird  11 , Alison Tree  12 , Amarnath Challapalli  13 , Amy Rylance  14 ; (Prostate Cancer UK Clinical Advisory Group)
Affiliations

Is the digital rectal exam any good as a prostate cancer screening test?

Mike Kirby et al. Br J Gen Pract. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Amy Rylance is an employee of Prostate Cancer UK.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The digital rectal examination. Source: © Prostate Cancer UK. Used with permission. Figure provided by Prostate Cancer UK, January 2024.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Krilaviciute A, Becker N, Lakes J, et al. Digital rectal examination is not a useful screening test for prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6(6):566–573. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management NG131. London: NICE; 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131 (accessed 7 Feb 2024).
    1. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–822. - PubMed
    1. Sathianathen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, et al. Negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;78(3):402–414. - PubMed
    1. Tan WS, Wong A, Mahmalji W, Raza A. Is there still a role for digital rectal examination in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway in the COVID-19 and post COVID-19 era? Aging Male. 2021;24(1):92–94. - PubMed

Substances