The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement
- PMID: 39223431
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08392-6
The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of preoperative VR-12 physical component scores (PCS) on outcomes following cervical disc replacement (CDR).
Methods: Patients undergoing elective CDR were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of interest included VR-12 PCS/VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS)/9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)/Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS and MCS/Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF)/Visual Analog Scale-Neck Pain (VAS-NP)/VAS-Arm Pain (VAS-AP)/Neck Disability Index (NDI). Baseline up to two-year postoperative scores were obtained (average follow-up: 9.2 ± 6.8months). Two cohorts were created: VR-12 PCS < 35 or VR-12 PCS ≥ 35. Improvements in scores from baseline to six weeks postoperatively and to final follow-up were calculated. Changes in scores were compared to previously reported thresholds to determine rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID).
Results: Of 127 patients, 64 were in the worse VR-12 PCS group. Patients with better VR-12 PCS were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.034). When accounting for insurance differences, the worse VR-12 PCS group reported inferior NDI/VAS-NP/PHQ-9/PROMIS-PF/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS at six weeks and final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The worse VR-12 PCS group reported greater improvements in VAS-AP and VR-12 PCS by six weeks and in NDI/VR-12 MCS/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.026, all). Patients with worse VR-12 PCS reported greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.034, both).
Conclusion: Following surgery, patients with worse VR-12 PCS report greater improvements in PROs, highlighting the increased relative impact of surgery for patients with worse baseline physical function. These findings can be used to optimize patient experience perioperatively and inform postoperative expectations.
Keywords: Cervical disc replacement; Patient-reported outcomes; Physical function; VR-12 PCS.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Cohen SP (2015) Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. ;90(2):284 – 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008 . PMID: 25659245
-
- Peng B, DePalma MJ (2018) Cervical disc degeneration and neck pain. J Pain Res. ;11:2853–2857. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S180018. PMID: 30532580; PMCID: PMC6241687
-
- Mazas S, Benzakour A, Castelain JE, Damade C, Ghailane S, Gille O (2019) Cervical disc herniation: which surgery? Int Orthop 43(4):761–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4221-3 Epub 2018 Nov 8. PMID: 30411247 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kumar C, Dietz N, Sharma M, Wang D, Ugiliweneza B, Boakye M (2020) Long-Term Comparison of Health Care Utilization and reoperation rates in patients undergoing cervical disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for cervical degenerative disc disease. World Neurosurg 134:e855–e865 Epub 2019 Nov 13. PMID: 31733395 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chang CJ, Liu YF, Hsiao YM, Huang YH, Liu KC, Lin RM, Lin CL Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Apr 22:1–10. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211500. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35453110
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous