The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis
- PMID: 39223470
- PMCID: PMC11367829
- DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02697-1
The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis
Abstract
Background: Open liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects.
Results: A total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Epidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance.
Trial registration: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.
Clinicaltrials: gov/ , NCT number: NCT06301932.
Keywords: Effectiveness and safety; Epidural analgesia; Open liver resection; Opioid consumption; Propensity score matching.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- Aloia TA, Kim BJ, Segraves-Chun YS, Cata JP, Truty MJ, Shi Q, et al. A randomized controlled trial of postoperative thoracic epidural Analgesia Versus Intravenous patient-controlled Analgesia after Major Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;266(3):545–54. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mallard CWB, Bauer B, Sloan PA, Rebel A. Effects of intraoperative epidural anesthesia during hepatectomy on intraoperative and post-operative patient outcomes. Int J Clin Anesth Res. 2018;2:23–30. 10.29328/journal.ijcar.1001008 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources