Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):2374.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19809-8.

Internet use, spatial variation and its determinants among reproductive age women in Ethiopia

Affiliations

Internet use, spatial variation and its determinants among reproductive age women in Ethiopia

Nega Abebe Meshesha et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Internet is the preferred source of health information for retrieving relevant information. In Ethiopia, the Internet penetration rate is improving year to year, but it is still at a low level compared to the rest of the world and neighboring African countries. Due to a lack of adequate information, it is important to assess Internet use, spatial variation, and determinants of Internet use among reproductive-age group women in Ethiopia.

Method: Secondary data from EDHS 2016 were used to analyze 15,683 women aged 15-49 years. Spatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS 10.7. The Bernoulli model was used by applying Kuldorff's methods using SaTScan 10.1.2 software to analyze the purely spatial clusters of Internet use. A multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression was applied to estimate community variance to identify individual- and community-level factors associated with Internet use. All models were fitted in STATA version 17.0, and finally, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported.

Result: The magnitude of Internet use was 4.97% ± 95% CI (4.63-5.32). The overall average age of women was 24.21 ± 8.06 years, with the age range 15-24 years constituting the larger group (39.2%). Women with secondary and above education [AOR = 6.47; 95% CI (5.04, 8.31)], unmarried [AOR = 2.60; 95% CI (1.89, 3.56)], rich [AOR = 1.95; 95% CI (1.00, 3.80)], own a mobile phone [AOR = 3.74; 95% CI (2.75, 5.09)], media exposure [AOR = 2.63; 95% CI (2.03, 3.42)], and urban [AOR = 1.80; 95% CI (1.08, 3.01)] had higher odds of Internet use. The spatial variation in Internet use was found to be nonrandom (global Moran's I = 0.58, p value < 0.001). Fifty-seven primary clusters were identified that were located in Addis Ababa city with a relative likelihood of 10.24 and a log-likelihood ratio of 425.16.

Conclusions: Internet use among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia is 4.97 and has significant spatial variation across the country. Both community- and individual-level factors affect Internet use in Ethiopia. Therefore, educating women, improving access to media, encouraging women to use family planning, and supporting household wealth could improve women's Internet use.

Keywords: Ethiopia; Internet use; Spatial variation; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study area map (Ethiopia) 2016. Shapefile source: CSA, 2013; URL: https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spatial variation in internet use across regions in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spatial autocorrelation of internet use among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia, 2016
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Hotspot analysis of internet use among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Ordinary kriging interpolation of Internet use among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Purely spatial analysis of Internet use among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016

References

    1. Communications GHC. 1998 undefined. The Internet: global information superhighway for the future. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jul 30]; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366497001503
    1. Antonio A, Tuffley D. The gender Digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet. 2014;6(4):673–87. 10.3390/fi6040673 - DOI
    1. Paola Serafino. Exploring the UK ’ s digital divide. Office Natl Stat 2019;(March 2019):1–24.
    1. Din HN, Mcdaniels-Davidson C, Nodora J, Hala Madanat D, Naz H. Profiles of a health information-seeking population and the current digital divide: cross-sectional analysis of the 2015–2016 California health interview survey. 2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doreen Bogdan-Martin. Measuring digital development. Facts and Fig. 2020. ITU Publications. 2020. 1–15 p.

LinkOut - more resources