Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Nov;35(6):e113.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e113. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Salvage hysterectomy for persistent residual cervical cancer: assessment of prognostic factors

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Salvage hysterectomy for persistent residual cervical cancer: assessment of prognostic factors

Munetaka Takekuma et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of 99 patients who underwent salvage hysterectomy for residual disease in the uterine cervix following the completion of definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer across 25 Japan Clinical Oncology Group-affiliated centers from 2005-2014, (i) time duration from the completion of definitive radiotherapy to the diagnosis of residual disease in the uterine cervix, (ii) salvage hysterectomy surgical margin status, and (iii) extent of residual disease, were independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, (i) time duration to identify residual disease of >62 days was associated with decreased PFS compared to ≤62 days (4-year rates 21.8% vs. 55.0%, adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR]=2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.55-4.67); (ii) presence of tumor in the surgical margin of hysterectomy specimen was associated with 4 times increased risk of disease progression compared to tumor-free surgical margin (4-year PFS rates 0% vs. 45.3%, aHR=4.27, 95% CI=2.20-8.29); and (iii) hazards of disease progression was 4.5-fold increased when the residual disease extended beyond the uterine cervix compared to residual disease within the uterine cervix only (4-year PFS rates 11.1% vs. 50.6%, aHR=4.54, 95% CI=2.60-7.95). In the absence of these 3 prognostic factors, 4-year PFS rate reached nearly 80% (78.6%, SAL-HYS criteria). In sum, these data suggested that early detection of persistent, residual disease following definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer may be the key to improve survival if salvage hysterectomy is considered as a tailored treatment option. Ideal surgical candidate would be uterine cervix-contained disease and assurance of adequate tumor-free surgical margin.

Keywords: Cervical Cancer; Disease Persistence; Hysterectomy, Salvage; Neoplasm, Residual; Radiotherapy; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PFS associated with salvage hysterectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS are shown based on (A) time to residual diagnosis, (B) hysterectomy margin status, (C) presence of extra-cervical disease, and (D) “SAL-HYS” criteria. Log-rank test for p-values. SAL-HYS criteria was assessed among 94 cases with complete information for the independent prognostic factors shown in Table S2, grouped based on the extent of prognostic factors: (i) time to diagnosis* (score=1 for >62 days, and score=0 for ≤62 days), (ii) hysterectomy surgical margin status (score=1 for tumor involvement, and score=0 for no tumor involvement), and (iii) residual tumor site (score=1 for cervix/extra-cervix, and score=0 for cervix only). Survival estimates are shown in Table S3.
C, cervical disease alone; EC, extra-cervical disease; Neg, negative; PFS, progression-free survival; Pos, positive. *Time duration from the completion of definitive radiotherapy to the date of residual cervical disease diagnosis.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center Japan. Cancer registry and statistics [Internet] Tokyo: National Cancer Center Japan; 2022. [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/
    1. Cibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, Centeno C, Chargari C, Felix A, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - update 2023. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33:649–666. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical cancer [Internet] Plymouth Meeting, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2024. [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: http://www.nccn.org.
    1. Seino M, Nagase S, Tokunaga H, Yamagami W, Kobayashi Y, Tabata T, et al. Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024;35:e15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types