Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 17;2(3):qyae075.
doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae075. eCollection 2024 Jul.

ESC pre-test probability estimates for obstructive coronary artery disease: can they be used in Brazil?

Affiliations

ESC pre-test probability estimates for obstructive coronary artery disease: can they be used in Brazil?

Fernanda Erthal et al. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. .

Abstract

Aims: Cardiovascular disease, primarily coronary artery disease (CAD), is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Accurate diagnosis of CAD often requires pre-test probability (PTP) estimation, traditionally performed using scoring systems like the Diamond-Forrester (DF) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) models. However, the applicability of such models in specific populations may vary. This study compares the performance of DF and PTP scores in the Brazilian context, using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a reference standard.

Methods and results: PTP for obstructive CAD was calculated using DF and ESC scores in 409 symptomatic patients without known CAD who underwent CCTA between 2019 and 2022. Predicted PTP was compared with actual CAD prevalence. DF overestimated CAD prevalence across age and symptom categories, while ESC showed better alignment with actual prevalence.

Conclusion: Our study confirms that the ESC PTP model is more appropriate than the DF model for determining PTP in the Brazilian population.

Keywords: CCTA; PTP; coronary atherosclerotic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: F.E.: Nothing to disclosure. R.L.: Nothing to disclosure. F.P.: Nothing to disclosure. R.G.: Nothing to disclosure. B.J.W.C. receives research support from TD Bank and Artrya. He is a consultant for and has an equity interest in Artrya.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population.

Similar articles

References

    1. SCOT-HEART Investigators; Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, Boon NA, Dweck MR et al. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2018;379:924–33. - PubMed
    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2982–3021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindstrom M, DeCleene N, Dorsey H, Fuster V, Johnson CO, LeGrand KE et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks collaboration, 1990–2021. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:2372–425. - PubMed
    1. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging*: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation quality strategic directions committee appropriateness criteria working group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475–97. - PubMed
    1. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources