Visual impact of diffusion optic technology lenses for myopia control
- PMID: 39225035
- DOI: 10.1111/opo.13386
Visual impact of diffusion optic technology lenses for myopia control
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the visual impact of Diffusion Optics Technology™ 0.2 DOT lenses (SightGlass Vision Inc.) designed for myopia control on primary gaze. DOT spectacle lenses contain light scattering elements that scatter light as it passes through the lens which, in turn, reduces retinal image contrast.
Methods: Fifty-one children (12.2 ± 1.3, range 10-14 years; 51% females) were randomly assigned to wear DOT spectacle (n = 27) or single vision lenses (n = 24) across six investigational sites in North America. Binocular high- and low-contrast distant visual acuities, near visual acuity, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity and glare were assessed in primary gaze after at least 3 years of wear, with the study 95% powered in all metrics to detect significant differences between the groups.
Results: Mean binocular distance high-contrast (-0.09 ± 0.02 vs. -0.08 ± 0.02 logMAR, p = 0.81), low-contrast (0.05 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02 logMAR, p = 0.52) and near visual acuity with glare sources (-0.06 ± 0.03 vs. -0.09 ± 0.03 logMAR, p = 0.32) were similar for DOT and single vision lens wearers, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was similar between children wearing DOT or single vision lenses across 11 of the 16 spatial frequencies (p > 0.05). Mean stereopsis was similar (p = 0.30) with the DOT lenses (33.2 ± 12.5″) and single vision lenses (38.1 ± 14.2″). Functional reading speed metrics were similar in both study groups, as was the objectively measured head tilt during reading (p > 0.05). The mean halo radius was 0.56° ± 0.17° with the DOT lenses compared with 0.50° ± 0.12° with single vision lenses (p = 0.02), but the statistically significant difference was smaller than the non-inferiority bound of 0.4°.
Conclusion: Diffusion optics technology lenses provide a clinically equivalent visual experience to a standard single vision lens.
Keywords: binocular vision; contrast sensitivity; diffusion optics technology; myopia control; myopia management; reading speed; visual function.
© 2024 SightGlass Vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042.
-
- Wu PC, Chuang MN, Choi J, Chen H, Wu G, Ohno‐Matsui K, et al. Update in myopia and treatment strategy of atropine use in myopia control. Eye. 2019;33:3–13.
-
- Wolffsohn JS, Whayeb Y, Logan NS, Wong R. IMI—global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice—2022 update. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64:ARVO E‐Abstract 6.
-
- Lam CSY, Tang WC, Qi H, Radhakrishnan H, Hasegawa K, To CH, et al. Effect of defocus incorporated multiple segments spectacle lens wear on visual function in myopic Chinese children. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:11. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.9.11
-
- Huang YY, Li X, Wang C, Zhou FC, Yang AL, Chen H, et al. Visual acuity, near phoria and accommodation in myopic children using spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets: results from a randomized clinical trial. Eye Vis. 2022;9:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662‐022‐00304‐3
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
