Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):3.
doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.3.

Postural control depends on early visual experience

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Postural control depends on early visual experience

Kirsten Hötting et al. J Vis. .

Abstract

The present study investigated the role of early visual experience in the development of postural control (balance) and locomotion (gait). In a cross-sectional design, balance and gait were assessed in 59 participants (ages 7-43 years) with a history of (a) transient congenital blindness, (b) transient late-onset blindness, (c) permanent congenitally blindness, or (d) permanent late-onset blindness, as well as in normally sighted controls. Cataract-reversal participants who experienced a transient phase of blindness and gained sight through cataract removal surgery showed worse balance performance compared with sighted controls even when tested with eyes closed. Individuals with reversed congenital cataracts performed worse than individuals with reversed developmental (late emerging) cataracts. Balance performance in congenitally cataract-reversal participants when tested with eyes closed was not significantly different from that in permanently blind participants. In contrast, their gait parameters did not differ significantly from those of sighted controls. The present findings highlight both the need for visual calibration of proprioceptive and vestibular systems and the crossmodal adaptability of locomotor functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean single-leg stance time (in seconds) for sight-recovery participants (CC and DC) and normally sighted controls (SCs), separately for the eyes-closed (EC) condition versus the eyes-open (EO) condition and for hard versus soft ground. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants. Horizontal lines indicate significant pairwise group differences (p < 0.05, post hoc test).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association between visual acuity (in logMAR) and single-leg stance time (in seconds) in sight-recovery participants, collapsed across hard and soft ground. Positive logMAR values indicate the degree of vision loss; higher values denote lower visual acuity.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean single-leg stance time (in seconds) with eyes closed, separately for congenitally cataract-reversal (CC) participants, developmental cataract-reversal (DC) participants, permanently congenitally blind (CB) participants, permanently late blind (LB) participants, and normally sighted controls (SCs) and for hard versus soft ground. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants. Horizontal lines indicate significant pairwise group differences (p < 0.05, post hoc test).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean stride length (A) and mean variability of stride length (B) for sight-recovery participants (CC and DC) and normally sighted controls (SCs), separately for the eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Mean stride time (A) and mean variability of stride time (B) for sight-recovery participants (CC and DC) and normally sighted controls (SCs), separately for the eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Mean gait speed (A) and mean variability of gait speed (B) for sight-recovery participants (CC and DC) and normally sighted controls (SCs), separately for the eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Mean stride length (A) and mean variability of stride length (B) in the eyes-closed condition, separately for congenitally cataract-reversal (CC) participants, developmental cataract-reversal (DC) participants, permanently congenitally blind (CB) participants, permanently late blind (LB) participants, and normally sighted controls (SCs). Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants. Horizontal lines indicate significant pairwise group differences (p < 0.05, post hoc test).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Mean gait speed (A) and mean variability of gait speed (B) in the eyes-closed condition, separately for congenitally cataract-reversal (CC) participants, developmental cataract-reversal (DC) participants, permanently congenitally blind (CB) participants, permanently late blind (LB) participants, and normally sighted controls (SCs). Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Dots represent data for individual participants. Horizontal lines indicate significant pairwise group differences (p < 0.05, post hoc test).

References

    1. Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015). Motor development. In Lerner R. M., Liben L. S., & Mueller U. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 2, pp. 113–157). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Augestad, L. B., & Jiang, L. (2015). Physical activity, physical fitness, and body composition among children and young adults with visual impairments: A systematic review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 33(3), 167–182, 10.1177/0264619615599813. - DOI
    1. Bach M (1996). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test—Automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 73(1), 49–53, 10.1097/00006324-199601000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balasubramaniam, R., & Wing, A. M. (2002). The dynamics of standing balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 531–536, 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02021-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bedny, M. (2017). Evidence from blindness for a cognitively pluripotent cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(9), 637–648, 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types