The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor
- PMID: 39227485
- PMCID: PMC11371992
- DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00759-9
The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor
Abstract
Physical exercise induces acute psychophysiological responses leading to chronic adaptations when the exercise stimulus is applied repeatedly, at sufficient time periods, and with appropriate magnitude. To maximize long-term training adaptations, it is crucial to control and manipulate the external load and the resulting psychophysiological strain. Therefore, scientists have developed a theoretical framework that distinguishes between the physical work performed during exercise (i.e., external load/intensity) and indicators of the body's psychophysiological response (i.e., internal load/intensity). However, the application of blood flow restriction (BFR) during exercise with low external loads/intensities (e.g., ≤ 30% of the one-repetition-maximum, ≤ 50% of maximum oxygen uptake) can induce physiological and perceptual responses, which are commonly associated with high external loads/intensities. This current opinion aimed to emphasize the mismatch between external and internal load/intensity when BFR is applied during exercise. In this regard, there is evidence that BFR can be used to manipulate both external load/intensity (by reducing total work when exercise is performed to exhaustion) and internal load/intensity (by leading to higher physiological and perceptual responses compared to exercise performed with the same external load/intensity without BFR). Furthermore, it is proposed to consider BFR as an additional exercise determinant, given that the amount of BFR pressure can determine not only the internal but also external load/intensity. Finally, terminological recommendations for the use of the proposed terms in the scientific context and for practitioners are given, which should be considered when designing, reporting, discussing, and presenting BFR studies, exercise, and/or training programs.
Keywords: Effort perception; Metabolic stress; Muscle pain; Stimulus; Terminology; Vascular occlusion.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Robert Bielitzki, Martin Behrens, Tom Behrendt, Alexander Franz, Christoph Centner, Luke Hughes, Stephen D. Patterson, Johnny Owens, Michael Behringer, and Lutz Schega declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this opinion article.
Figures
References
-
- Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F, Gissane C, McCarthy D, Clarke T, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: a UK National Health Service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med. 2019;49:1787–805. 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2. 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gray SM, Cuomo AM, Proppe CE, Traylor MK, Hill EC, Keller JL. Effects of sex and cuff pressure on physiological responses during blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55:920–31. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003103. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003103 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
