Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 4;10(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00759-9.

The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor

Affiliations

The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor

Robert Bielitzki et al. Sports Med Open. .

Abstract

Physical exercise induces acute psychophysiological responses leading to chronic adaptations when the exercise stimulus is applied repeatedly, at sufficient time periods, and with appropriate magnitude. To maximize long-term training adaptations, it is crucial to control and manipulate the external load and the resulting psychophysiological strain. Therefore, scientists have developed a theoretical framework that distinguishes between the physical work performed during exercise (i.e., external load/intensity) and indicators of the body's psychophysiological response (i.e., internal load/intensity). However, the application of blood flow restriction (BFR) during exercise with low external loads/intensities (e.g., ≤ 30% of the one-repetition-maximum, ≤ 50% of maximum oxygen uptake) can induce physiological and perceptual responses, which are commonly associated with high external loads/intensities. This current opinion aimed to emphasize the mismatch between external and internal load/intensity when BFR is applied during exercise. In this regard, there is evidence that BFR can be used to manipulate both external load/intensity (by reducing total work when exercise is performed to exhaustion) and internal load/intensity (by leading to higher physiological and perceptual responses compared to exercise performed with the same external load/intensity without BFR). Furthermore, it is proposed to consider BFR as an additional exercise determinant, given that the amount of BFR pressure can determine not only the internal but also external load/intensity. Finally, terminological recommendations for the use of the proposed terms in the scientific context and for practitioners are given, which should be considered when designing, reporting, discussing, and presenting BFR studies, exercise, and/or training programs.

Keywords: Effort perception; Metabolic stress; Muscle pain; Stimulus; Terminology; Vascular occlusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Robert Bielitzki, Martin Behrens, Tom Behrendt, Alexander Franz, Christoph Centner, Luke Hughes, Stephen D. Patterson, Johnny Owens, Michael Behringer, and Lutz Schega declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this opinion article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of the influence of blood flow restriction (BFR) on example parameters of internal and external load during several exercise modalities with (A) matched external load and (B) to exhaustion. The numbers on the individual parameters refer to the articles’ reference list
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of a conceptual framework of exercise with blood flow restriction. The external load is determined by a variety of exercise parameters, which also dictate the psychophysiological responses, and therefore, the internal load. The internal load in response to a specific external load depends on a multitude of influencing factors (i.e., environmental and personal factors). The level of relative cuff pressure, along with other variables, represents a modifiable environmental factor to manipulate the internal load. Relative cuff pressures between 40 and 80% of the individuals’ arterial occlusion pressure are assumed to induce favorable long-term adaptations

References

    1. Held S, Behringer M, Donath L. Low intensity rowing with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases V̇O2max in elite rowers: a randomized controlled trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23:304–8. 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.002. 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patterson SD, Ferguson RA. Enhancing strength and postocclusive calf blood flow in older people with training with blood-flow restriction. J Aging Phys Act. 2011;19:201–13. 10.1123/japa.19.3.201. 10.1123/japa.19.3.201 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F, Gissane C, McCarthy D, Clarke T, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: a UK National Health Service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med. 2019;49:1787–805. 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2. 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gray SM, Cuomo AM, Proppe CE, Traylor MK, Hill EC, Keller JL. Effects of sex and cuff pressure on physiological responses during blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55:920–31. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003103. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas HJ, Scott BR, Peiffer JJ. Acute physiological responses to low-intensity blood flow restriction cycling. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21:969–74. 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.013. 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources