Pharmacokinetic model-based assessment of factor IX prophylaxis treatment regimens in severe hemophilia B
- PMID: 39227636
- PMCID: PMC11372059
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70784-x
Pharmacokinetic model-based assessment of factor IX prophylaxis treatment regimens in severe hemophilia B
Abstract
An important aspect of improving care for people with hemophilia B (HB) is developing optimal treatment strategies. Here we aimed to provide in-silico evidence, comparing the estimated optimal posology of factor IX (FIX) products to support the patient-physician decision-making process. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-based assessment comparing the performance of FIX products (rFIX, rIX-FP, rFIXFc, N9-GP) was developed. PopPK analyses were used to determine a product's optimal posology to target predefined steady-state FIX activity trough levels in a hypothetical population of 10,000 people with severe HB. Model-derived optimal posologies were compared across several parameters including trough levels, proportion of patients per regimen and consumption, considering 64 hypothetical patient scenarios of different FIX trough level targets and ages. Results indicated a marked difference between FIX products estimated to achieve target trough levels, consumption and dosing frequencies. rIX-FP was associated with higher trough levels than rFIX and rFIXFc, at a lower weekly dose and administration frequency, across all age groups. N9-GP use in adolescents and adults was associated with lower consumption compared with rIX-FP. Insights from this study may be utilized by clinicians to inform decision-making, by considering the model-generated estimated optimal posologies alongside multiple clinical factors and patient preferences.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
BV and PM are employed by Exigo Consultores, contracted by CSL Behring for the development of the research project. GC has served on advisory committees/speaker for Baxalta, Bayer, CSL Behring, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, SOBI and UniQure and received research support from Pfizer, SOBI and CSL Behring. MTAR has participated as speakers in advisory boards and sponsored symposia with Amgen, CSL Behring, Grifols, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, SOBI and Takeda. CEE has acted as a consultant, and received speaker’s fees and/or research funding from Alnylam, Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, Grifols, Kedrion, Octapharma, Novo Nordisk, Roche, SOBI, Takeda, LN has received speaker or consultancy fees from Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, SOBI and Takeda. RT, JR and KP are employees of CSL Behring.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
