Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 2:36:e20240150en.
doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240150-en. eCollection 2024.

Update on the Epimed Monitor Adult ICU Database: 15 years of its use in national registries, quality improvement initiatives and clinical research

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations
Review

Update on the Epimed Monitor Adult ICU Database: 15 years of its use in national registries, quality improvement initiatives and clinical research

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Marcio Soares et al. Crit Care Sci. .

Abstract

In recent decades, several databases of critically ill patients have become available in both low-, middle-, and high-income countries from all continents. These databases are also rich sources of data for the surveillance of emerging diseases, intensive care unit performance evaluation and benchmarking, quality improvement projects and clinical research. The Epimed Monitor database is turning 15 years old in 2024 and has become one of the largest of these databases. In recent years, there has been rapid geographical expansion, an increase in the number of participating intensive care units and hospitals, and the addition of several new variables and scores, allowing a more complete characterization of patients to facilitate multicenter clinical studies. As of December 2023, the database was being used regularly for 23,852 beds in 1,723 intensive care units and 763 hospitals from ten countries, totaling more than 5.6 million admissions. In addition, critical care societies have adopted the system and its database to establish national registries and international collaborations. In the present review, we provide an updated description of the database; report experiences of its use in critical care for quality improvement initiatives, national registries and clinical research; and explore other potential future perspectives and developments.

RESUMO: Nas últimas décadas, foram disponibilizados vários bancos de dados de pacientes em estado crítico em países de baixa, média e alta renda de todos os continentes. Esses bancos de dados também são fontes ricas de dados para a vigilância de doenças emergentes, avaliação de desempenho e análise comparativa de unidades de terapia intensiva, projetos de melhoria da qualidade e pesquisa clínica. O banco de dados Epimed Monitor completa 15 anos em 2024 e se tornou um dos maiores desses bancos de dados. Nos últimos anos, observaram-se a rápida expansão geográfica, o aumento no número de unidades de terapia intensiva e hospitais participantes e a inclusão de diversas novas variáveis e escores, permitindo uma caracterização mais completa dos pacientes para facilitar estudos clínicos multicêntricos. Em dezembro de 2023, o banco de dados era usado sistematicamente por 23.852 leitos em 1.723 unidades de terapia intensiva e 763 hospitais de dez países, totalizando mais de 5,6 milhões de internações. Além disso, as sociedades de terapia intensiva adotaram o sistema e seu banco de dados para criar registros nacionais e cooperações internacionais. Nesta revisão, apresentamos uma descrição atualizada do banco de dados; relatamos experiências de seu uso em cuidados intensivos para iniciativas de melhoria da qualidade, registros nacionais e pesquisa clínica; e exploramos outras possíveis perspectivas e futuros avanços.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: M. Soares and J. I. F. Salluh are founders and equity shareholders of Epimed Solutions®, which commercializes the Epimed Monitor System®, a cloud-based software for intensive care units management and benchmarking. L. P. Borges, G. A. Miranda and L R. G. Mello are employees of Epimed Solutions®. G. Burghi is an associate commercial partner of Epimed Solutions in Uruguay. E. A. C. Rezende is the coordinator of the Brazilian Intensive Care Unit Registry. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of hospitals and intensive care units in countries using the Epimed Monitor Adult ICU Database with the respective starting years.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Yearly (2010 - 2023) trends in (A) the number of hospitals, intensive care units and intensive care unit beds and (B) the total number of intensive care unit admissions.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Yearly (2010 - 2023) trends in (A) the proportion of patients according to the admission type and (B) the five most frequent diagnosis categories within each admission type.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Yearly (2010 - 2023) trends in the frequency of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use and renal replacement therapy.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Yearly (2010 - 2023) trends in (A) intensive care unit and (B) hospital lengths of stay (boxplot; the blue dots represent the mean value); (C) mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (with respective 95% confidence intervals) and hospital mortality rate.
Figura 1
Figura 1. Hospitais e unidades de terapia intensiva em países que usam o banco de dados Epimed Monitor de unidade de terapia intensiva adulto com os respectivos anos iniciais.
Figura 2
Figura 2. Tendências anuais (2010 - 2023) em (A) número de hospitais, unidades de terapia intensiva e leitos de unidades de terapia intensiva e (B) número total de internações em unidades de terapia intensiva.
Figura 3
Figura 3. Tendências anuais (2010 - 2023) em (A) proporção de pacientes conforme o tipo de internação e (B) as cinco categorias de diagnóstico mais frequentes em cada tipo de internação.
Figura 4
Figura 4. Tendências anuais (2010 - 2023) na frequência de ventilação mecânica, uso de vasopressores e terapia de substituição renal.
Figura 5
Figura 5. Tendências anuais (2010 - 2023) em (A) unidade de terapia intensiva e (B) tempo de internação hospitalar ( boxplot ; os pontos azuis representam o valor médio); (C) Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 médio (com respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95%) e taxa de mortalidade hospitalar.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnson AE, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, Gayles A, Shammout A, Horng S, et al. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data . 2023;10(1):1–1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salluh JI, Quintairos A, Dongelmans DA, Aryal D, Bagshaw S, Beane A, Burghi G, López MD, Finazzi S, Guidet B, Hashimoto S, Ichihara N, Litton E, Lone NI, Pari V, Sendagire C, Vijayaraghavan BK, Haniffa R, Pisani L, Pilcher D, Linking of Global Intensive Care (LOGIC) and Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database (JIPAD) Working Group National ICU Registries as Enablers of Clinical Research and Quality Improvement. Crit Care Med . 2024;52(1):125–135. - PubMed
    1. Zampieri FG, Soares M, Borges LP, Salluh JI, Ranzani OT. The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a cloud-based national registry for adult intensive care unit patients in Brazil. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva . 2017;29(4):418–426. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UTIs Brasileiras [citado 2018 May 27]; Registro Nacional de Terapia Intensiva. [Internet] . Disponível em: http://www.utisbrasileiras.com.br .
    1. Quintairos A, Rezende EA, Soares M, Lobo SM, Salluh JI. Leveraging a national cloud-based intensive care registry for COVID-19 surveillance, research and case-mix evaluation in Brazil. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva . 2022;34(2):205–209. - PMC - PubMed