Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Oct 8;68(10):e0090724.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00907-24. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Clinical outcomes and emergence of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Clinical outcomes and emergence of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam

Dariusz A Hareza et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Few studies compare outcomes of patients with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam. A multicenter prospective study was conducted of unique patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infections from 2018 to 2023 receiving >72 h of ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam, with confirmation that the P. aeruginosa isolate was susceptible to the agent administered by broth microdilution. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) incorporating propensity scores was utilized to ensure balanced baseline characteristics. Regression performed on the post-IPW group determined 30-day mortality and subsequent emergence of resistance (i.e., ≥4-fold increase in MIC) to the initial treatment (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam). Among 186 eligible patients, 102 (55%) received ceftolozane-tazobactam and 84 (45%) received ceftazidime-avibactam. In the post-IPW cohort, balance was achieved across all variables [e.g., demographics, severity of illness, severe immunocompromise, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), source of infection, combination therapy]. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam groups [21% vs 17%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.90-1.14)]. Emergence of resistance was higher in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group [38% vs 25%; aOR: 1.89 (95% CI: 0.98-4.88)], but did not achieve statistical significance. Prolonged treatment durations and use of CRRT were associated with increased emergence of resistance (both P = 0.04). Although the survival of patients with DTR P. aeruginosa infections appears similar regardless of whether ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam is prescribed, the emergence of resistance may be more concerning with the former. Plausible mechanistic explanations support these findings. Modifiable risk factors were identified that may mitigate this risk.

Keywords: PDC; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; antimicrobial resistance; ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.A.H., K.D., A.M.H., T.T., and P.D.T. have no conflicts to disclose. S.E.C. reports payment from Debiopharm for participation on an advisory board or data and safety monitoring board, outside of the submitted work. R.A.B. receives research funding from Shionogi, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Entasis Therapeutics, and Wockhardt; received research funding from Allecra Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Harrington Family Foundation, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Steris, and Melinta Therapeutics; and received an honoraria from Unilab. S.M.K. served on an Advisory Board for Entasis/Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics. P.J.S. reports grants and personal fees from Accelerate Diagnostics, OpGen, QIAGEN Sciences Inc, and B.D. Diagnostics; grants from bioMerieux, Inc, Affinity Biosensors, T2 Diagnostics, and Hardy Diagnostics; personal consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Shionogi, Inc, Innoviva Therapeutics, Entasis, Merck & Co, Day Zero Diagnostic, Next Gen Diagnostics, and GeneCapture, outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria for speaking engagements from GenMark Dx, OpGen Inc, and B.D. Diagnostics; and stock or stock options from GeneCapture, Day Zero Diagnostics, and Next Gen Diagnostics.

References

    1. Satlin MJ, Walsh TJ. 2017. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: three major threats to hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 19. doi:10.1111/tid.12762 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tumbarello M, De Pascale G, Trecarichi EM, Spanu T, Antonicelli F, Maviglia R, Pennisi MA, Bello G, Antonelli M. 2013. Clinical outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med 39:682–692. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2828-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. 2019. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv 37:177–192. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glen KA, Lamont IL. 2021. beta-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: current status, future prospects. Pathogens 10:1638. doi:10.3390/pathogens10121638 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Prevots DR, Palmore TN, Rhee C, Klompas M, Dekker JP, Powers JH, Suffredini AF, Hooper DC, Fridkin S, Danner RL, National Institutes of Health Antimicrobial Resistance Outcomes Research Initiative (NIH–ARORI) . 2018. Difficult-to-treat resistance in Gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin Infect Dis 67:1803–1814. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy378 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources