Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep:8:e2400191.
doi: 10.1200/PO.24.00191.

Personalized Therapy Selection by Integration of Molecular Cancer Classification by the 92-Gene Assay and Tumor Profiling in Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary

Affiliations

Personalized Therapy Selection by Integration of Molecular Cancer Classification by the 92-Gene Assay and Tumor Profiling in Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary

Harry E Fuentes Bayne et al. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a syndrome comprising metastatic cancers without a clinically identified primary site. Although patients with CUP have an unfavorable prognosis, treatment with site-specific therapies guided by clinical features, standard pathology, and molecular assays can improve overall survival. The 92-gene assay (CancerTYPE ID) is a gene expression-based classifier that helps identify the tissue of origin for metastatic cancers with unknown or uncertain diagnoses. This study reports the frequency of selected molecular aberrations of oncogenes, including KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA1/2, and BRAF, in patients with CUP in the MOSAIC database to highlight potential treatment options.

Methods: MOSAIC is a database of patients with CUP submitted for CancerTYPE ID testing and NeoTYPE biomarker testing. Tumor biopsy samples were analyzed by CancerTYPE ID for tumor type identification and further tested for molecular aberrations of oncogenes, including KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA1/2, and BRAF.

Results: CancerTYPE ID identified a specific tumor type in 92.5% (2,929 of 3,168) of CUP cases in the MOSAIC database. The most commonly identified histological type was adenocarcinoma (75.4%), with pancreaticobiliary being the most common molecularly diagnosed cancer (24.9%). Aberrations in KRAS, IDH1/2, BRCA, and BRAF genes were identified in 18.8% (n = 597) of biopsies. A cancer-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved or investigational targeted therapy was potentially available for 24.6% (n = 147) of these patients.

Conclusion: This retrospective analysis supports incorporating CancerTYPE ID into the evaluation for patients with CUP to help determine the tissue of origin and identify actionable genetic alterations. This approach may allow more patients with CUP to benefit from site-specific FDA-approved targeted therapies or enrollment into clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

F. Anthony Greco

Honoraria: Biotheranostics

Consulting or Advisory Role: Biotheranostics

Speakers' Bureau: Biotheranostics

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CUP and uncertain diagnoses: distribution of cancer type molecular diagnoses by CancerTYPE ID. CUP, cancer of unknown primary; GIST, GI stromal tumor; QNS, quantity not sufficient.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Integration of tumor typing and molecular profiling to enable personalized therapy selection in CUP or other uncertain diagnoses. CUP, cancer of unknown primary.

References

    1. Ding Y, Jiang J, Xu J, et al. : Site-specific therapy in cancers of unknown primary site: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ESMO Open 7:100407, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olivier T, Fernandez E, Labidi-Galy I, et al. : Redefining cancer of unknown primary: Is precision medicine really shifting the paradigm? Cancer Treat Rev 97:102204, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Ettinger DS, Stevenson MM, Mutar SA, et al. : Occult primary (cancer of unknown primary [CUP]). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/occult.pdf
    1. Varadhachary GR, Greco FA: Overview of patient management and future directions in unknown primary carcinoma. Semin Oncol 36:75-80, 2009 - PubMed
    1. Binder C, Matthes KL, Korol D, et al. : Cancer of unknown primary—Epidemiological trends and relevance of comprehensive genomic profiling. Cancer Med 7:4814-4824, 2018 - PMC - PubMed

Substances