Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Nov;11(6):e200291.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200291. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Diagnostic Value of Inter-Eye Difference Metrics on OCT for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Optic Neuritis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Diagnostic Value of Inter-Eye Difference Metrics on OCT for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Optic Neuritis

Giulio Volpe et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The 2022 International Consortium for Optic Neuritis diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis (ON) include optical coherence tomography (OCT). The diagnostic value of intereye difference (IED) metrics is high for ON in patients with multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, but unknown in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated ON (MOG-ON).

Methods: A multicenter validation study was conducted on the published IED cutoff values (>4% or >4 μm in the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer [mGCIP] or >5% or >5 μm in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL]) in individuals with MOG-ON and age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Structural data were acquired with Spectralis spectral-domain OCT >6 months after ON. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics for both intereye percentage (IEPD) and absolute difference (IEAD).

Results: A total of 66 individuals were included (MOG-ON N = 33; HCs N = 33). ON was unilateral in 20 and bilateral in 13 subjects. In the pooled analysis, the mGCIP IEPD was most sensitive (92%), followed by the mGCIP IEAD (88%) and pRNFL (84%). The same pattern was found for the specificity (mGCIP IEPD 82%, IEAD 82%; pRNFL IEPD 82%, IEAD 79%).In subgroup analyses, the diagnostic sensitivity was higher in subjects with unilateral ON (>99% for all metrics) compared with bilateral ON (61%-78%).

Discussion: In individuals with MOG-ON, the diagnostic accuracy of OCT-based IED metrics for ON was high, especially of mGCIP IEPD.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that the intereye difference on OCT can distinguish between those with MOG and normal controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Petzold received grant support for remyelination trials in multiple sclerosis to the Amsterdam University Medicam Centre, Department of Neurology, MS Centre (RESTORE trial) and UCL, London RECOVER trial, Fight for Sight (nimodipine in optic neuritis trial), royalties or licenses from Up-to-Date (Wolters Kluver) on a book chapter, speaker fees for the Heidelberg Academy, participation on Advisory Board SC Zeiss OCTA Angi-Network, SC Novartis OCTiMS study, leadership roles for governing board IMSVISUAL (until DEC-2022), chairman ERN-EYE Neuro-ophthalmology (until OCT-2020), board member of National Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Association, equipment: OCTA from Zeiss (Plex Elite), medical writing: Support from Novartis for manuscript doi: 10.1002/acn3.51473. F.C. Oertel reports past research funding by the American Academy of Neurology, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (US) and the German Association of Neurology (DGN); current research support by the Hertie Foundation for Excellence in Clinical Neurosciences and by Novartis AG - both unrelated to this project. F. Paul has received honoraria and research support from Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Chugai, MerckSerono, Novartis, Genyzme, MedImmune, Shire, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and serves on scientific advisory boards for Alexion, MedImmune, Novartis, and UCB. He has received funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Exc 257), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis), Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation, EU Framework Program 7, and National Multiple Sclerosis Society of the USA. He serves on the steering committee of the N-Momentum study with inebilizumab (Horizon Therapeutics) and the OCTiMS Study (Novartis). He is an associate editor with Neurology: Neuroimmunology, and Neuroinflammation and academic editor with PLoS One. M.R. Yeaman is founder and shareholder of NovaDigm Therapeutics, Inc. and Metacin, Inc. He receives grant support from the United States National Institutes of Health and the United State Department of Defense, he is an advisor to the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation, he has received honoraria for academic presentations and consultation from Genentech-Roche, Horizon-Amgen and AstraZeneca-Alexion. N. Jurkute has received honoraria for academic presentations and consultation from Chiesi; L.J. Cook institution received grant support from Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Intereye Percentage and Absolute Differences
IEPD and IEAD comparisons using a beeswarm plot for (A–B) pRNFL and (C–D) mGCIP. The IEPD and IEAD of pRNFL and mGCIP were significantly higher in MOG-ON compared with HCs (p < 0.001). HCs = healthy controls; IEAD = intereye absolute difference; IEPD = intereye percentage difference; mGCIP = combined macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; MOG-ON = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated optic neuritis; pRNFL = peripapillary retina nerve fiber layer.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity of IED in MOG-ON
ROC curves for IED for pRNFL and mGCIP discriminating between MOG-ON vs HCs. ROC curves are plotted for all subjects with MOG-ON. All parameters exhibited a high discriminative power when comparing patients with MOG-ON with HCs, considering the entire subject pool (A–D). AUC = area under the curve; HCs = healthy controls; IEAD = intereye absolute difference; IEPD = intereye percentage difference; mGCIP = combined macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; MOG-ON = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated optic neuritis; pRNFL = peripapillary retina nerve fiber layer; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity of IED in Unilateral MOG-ON
ROC curves for IED for pRNFL and mGCIP discriminating between unilateral MOG-ON vs HCs. ROC curves are plotted for unilateral MOG-ON. All parameters exhibited a high discriminative power when comparing patients with unilateral MOG-ON with HCs (A–D). AUC = area under the curve; HCs = healthy controls; IEAD = intereye absolute difference; IEPD = intereye percentage difference; mGCIP = combined macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; MOG-ON = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated optic neuritis; pRNFL = peripapillary retina nerve fiber layer; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity of IED in Bilateral MOG-ON
ROC curves for IED for pRNFL and mGCIP discriminating between bilateral MOG-ON vs HCs. ROC curves are plotted for bilateral MOG-ON. In the context of bilateral MOG-ON presentations, measured parameters show a moderate discriminative power in distinguishing MOG-ON from the healthy control group (A–D). AUC = area under the curve; HCs = healthy controls; IEAD = intereye absolute difference; IEPD = intereye percentage difference; mGCIP = combined macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; MOG-ON = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated optic neuritis; pRNFL = peripapillary retina nerve fiber layer; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.

References

    1. Petzold A, Fraser CL, Abegg M, et al. . Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(12):1120-1134. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00200-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costello F, Burton JM. Retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography: a biomarker in multiple sclerosis? Eye Brain. 2018;10:47-63. doi:10.2147/EB.S139417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petzold A, Balcer LJ, Calabresi PA, et al. . Retinal layer segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(10):797-812. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30278-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costello F, Coupland S, Hodge W, et al. . Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(6):963-969. doi:10.1002/ana.20851 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petzold A, Chua SYL, Khawaja AP, et al. . Retinal asymmetry in multiple sclerosis. Brain J Neurol. 2021;144(1):224-235. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa361 - DOI - PMC - PubMed