Post- Dobbs Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind
- PMID: 39231409
- PMCID: PMC11375356
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792
Post- Dobbs Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind
Abstract
The June 24, 2022 US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in an expansive restriction on abortion access that had been constitutionally guaranteed for nearly half a century. Currently, 14 states have implemented complete bans on abortion with very limited exceptions, and an additional 7 states have implemented abortion bans at 6 to 18 weeks' gestation. It has been well demonstrated that restrictive policies disproportionately limit abortion access for minoritized people and people of low socioeconomic status; the financial and geographic barriers of these post-Dobbs restrictions will only exacerbate this disparity. Proponents of abortion restrictions, who identify as pro-life, assert that these policies are essential to protect children, women, and families. We examine whether the protection of these groups extends past conception by evaluating the association between state abortion legislation and state-based policies and programs designed to provide medical and social support for children, women, and families. We found that states with the most restrictive post-Dobbs abortion policies in fact have the least comprehensive and inclusive public infrastructure to support these groups. We suggest further opportunities for advocacy. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792).
Figures

Similar articles
-
Impact of State Abortion Policies on Family Medicine Practice and Training After Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.Ann Fam Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;22(6):492-501. doi: 10.1370/afm.3183. Ann Fam Med. 2024. PMID: 39586689 Free PMC article.
-
Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1558-1564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4266. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38526865 Free PMC article.
-
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39581967 Free PMC article.
-
Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans.Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;11(10):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00096-8. Epub 2024 May 22. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38795722 Review.
-
The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes.Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Aug;23(8):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01512-4. Epub 2023 May 22. Curr Diab Rep. 2023. PMID: 37213059 Review.
Cited by
-
The relationship between state-level abortion policy and maternal mortality in the United States: a scoping review.Health Aff Sch. 2025 Aug 14;3(8):qxaf146. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf146. eCollection 2025 Aug. Health Aff Sch. 2025. PMID: 40823007 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jerman J, Jones RK, Onda T. Characteristics of US abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014. Accessed March 21, 2023.
-
- Liu E, Shen W. The Hyde Amendment: an overview. 2022. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=IF12167. Accessed October 25, 2023.
-
- Department of Health and Human Services. 2022 Poverty guidelines: 48 contiguous states (all states except Alaska and Hawaii). Available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/4b515876c467446642397.... Accessed August 1, 2024.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous