Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 4:13:e57860.
doi: 10.2196/57860.

Evaluation of the Continuing Education Training "Beratende für Digitale Gesundheitsversorgung" ("Consultant for Digital Healthcare"): Protocol for an Effectiveness Study

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Continuing Education Training "Beratende für Digitale Gesundheitsversorgung" ("Consultant for Digital Healthcare"): Protocol for an Effectiveness Study

Bernhard Kraft et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: The digital transformation in health care requires training nursing and health professionals in the digitally competent use of digital assistive technologies (DAT). The continuing education training "Beratende für digitale Gesundheitsversorgung" ("Consultant for Digital Healthcare") was developed to fill this gap. The effectiveness of the training program will be assessed in this study.

Objective: The primary objective is to record and measure the participants' learning success. We will assess whether the previously defined teaching intentions, learning objectives, competencies, and participants' expectations have been achieved and whether a transfer of learning occurred. The secondary objective is participant satisfaction and feasibility of the training. The tertiary objective is the successful transfer of DAT by participants in their institutions.

Methods: Approximately 65 nursing and health care professionals will participate in the pilot phase of the further training and evaluation process, which is planned in a mixed methods design in a nonsequential manner. The different methods will be combined in the interpretation of the results to achieve a synaptic view of the training program. We plan to conduct pre-post surveys in the form of participant self-assessments about dealing with DAT and content-related knowledge levels. Exploratory individual interviews will also be conducted to build theory, to examine whether and to what extent competence (cognition) has increased, and whether dealing (affect) with DAT has changed. Furthermore, an interim evaluation within the framework of the Teaching Analysis Poll (TAP) will occur. The knowledge thereby gained will be used to revise and adapt the modules for future courses. To assess the transfer success, the participants create a practical project, which is carried out within the training framework, observed by the lecturers, and subsequently evaluated and adapted.

Results: We expect that the learning objectives for the continuing education training will be met. The attendees are expected to increase their level of digital competence in different skills areas: (1) theoretical knowledge, (2) hands-on skills for planning the application and practical use of DAT, (3) reflective skills and applying ethical and legal considerations in their use, (4) applying all that in a structured process of technology implementation within their practical sphere of work.

Conclusions: The aim of this study and appropriate further training program are to educate nursing and health care professionals in the use of DAT, thereby empowering them for a structured change process toward digitally aided care. This focus gives rise to the following research questions: First, how should further training programs be developed, and which focus is appropriate for addressee-appropriate learning goals, course structure, and general curriculum? Second, how should a training program with this specific content and area be evaluated? Third, what are the conditions to offer a continued program?

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/57860.

Keywords: Teaching Analysis Poll; digital competence; digital health; digital healthcare; digital-assistive technologies; digitization; effectiveness study; exploratory; further training program; health professional; health professionals; innovation; intervention; mixed-method; nursing; nursing and health care professionals; nursings; satisfaction; self-assessment; technologies; technology; training program; transfer of learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alves-Oliveira P, Petisca S, Correia F, Maia N, Paiva A. Social Robots for Older Adults: Framework of Activities for Aging in Place with Robots. In: Tapus A, André E, Martin JC, Ferland F, Ammi M, editors. Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. pp. 11–20.
    1. Assistive technology. World Health Organization. [2024-06-21]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology .
    1. Krick T, Huter K, Seibert K, Domhoff D, Wolf-Ostermann K. Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05106-8. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-0... 10.1186/s12913-020-05106-8 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deutscher Ethikrat. Berlin, Germany: Deutscher Ethikrat; 2020. Mar 10, [2024-08-29]. Robotik für gute Pflege. https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/deutsch/... .
    1. Blinkert B, Klie T. Solidarität in Gefahr? Veränderungen der Pflegebereitschaften und Konsequenzen für die Altenhilfe und Pflege. In: Klie T, Buhl A, Entzian H, Hedtke-Becker A, editors. Die Zukunft der gesundheitlichen, sozialen und pflegerischen Versorgung älterer Menschen. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Mabuse-Verl; 2005. pp. 293–315.

LinkOut - more resources