Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20617.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71657-z.

Artificial intelligence for ultrasonographic detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations

Artificial intelligence for ultrasonographic detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Roongruedee Chaiteerakij et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The effectiveness of ultrasonography (USG) in liver cancer screening is partly constrained by the operator's expertise. We aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-assisted system for detecting and classifying focal liver lesions (FLLs) from USG images. This retrospective study incorporated 26,288 USG images from 5444 patients to train YOLOv5 model for FLLs detection and classification of seven different types of FLLs, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), focal fatty infiltration, focal fatty sparing (FFS), cyst, hemangioma, and regenerative nodules. AI model performance was assessed for detection and diagnosis of the FLLs on a per-image and per-lesion basis. The AI achieved an overall FLLs detection rate of 84.8% (95%CI:83.3-86.4), with consistent performance for FLLs ≤ 1 cm and > 1 cm. It also exhibited sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing malignant FLLs from other benign FLLs at 97.0% (95%CI:95. 9-98.2) and 97.0% (95%CI:95.9-98.1), respectively. Among specific FLL types, CCA detection rate was at 92.2% (95%CI:88.0-96.4), followed by FFS at 89.7% (95%CI:87.1-92.3), and HCC at 82.3% (95%CI:77.1-87.5). The specificities and NPVs for regenerative nodules were 100% and 99.9% (95%CI:99.8-100.0), respectively. Our AI model can potentially assist physicians in FLLs detection and diagnosis during USG examinations. Further external validation is needed for clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The ultrasonographic images of seven different types of FLLs. (A) FLLs manually labled, (B) FLLs predicted by AI.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the AI system development process.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustration of YOLO inference phase with grid partition (left), bounding boxes prediction (middle), and the result after NMS and confidence thresholding (right).

References

    1. Harris, P. S. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: An evidence-based approach. World J. Gastroenterol.25(13), 1550–1559 (2019). 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1550 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neuzillet, C. et al. Management of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Guidelines of the French association for the study of the Liver (AFEF). Liver Int.10.1111/liv.15948 (2024). 10.1111/liv.15948 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan, S. A., Toledano, M. B. & Taylor-Robinson, S. D. Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB10(2), 77–82 (2008). 10.1080/13651820801992641 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massarweh, N. N. & El-Serag, H. B. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Control.24(3), 1073274817729245 (2017). 10.1177/1073274817729245 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singal, A. G. et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology78(6), 1922–1965 (2023). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources