Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Sep 4;25(1):707.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07749-8.

Comparing the effects of neck stabilization exercises versus dynamic exercises among patients having nonspecific neck pain with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the effects of neck stabilization exercises versus dynamic exercises among patients having nonspecific neck pain with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial

Asma Batool et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a well-established global burden affecting. It is also a common problem in Pakistan. The burden of neck pain is also increasing day by day due to poor work ergonomics, and increased use of computers and mobiles after the pandemic. An individual's poor posture is often associated with forward head posture (FHP). Limited evidence is available about the effects of neck stabilization (NSE) and dynamic exercises (NDE) for nonspecific neck pain particularly in patients with FHP. This aimed to compare the effects of NSE versus NDE among patients having NSNP with FHP in reducing pain, disability, forward head posture and improving neck range of motion.

Methods: It is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with 60 patients aged 18-40 years, with moderate intensity NSNP for > 3 weeks and < 6 months along with FHP with a moderate disability on neck disability index (NDI) randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Group 1 was doing NSE and group 2 was doing NDE. Transcutaneous Electical Nerve Stimulation, cold packs, and stretching exercises were given to both groups. A total of 9 sessions (3 sessions/ week) were given to participants. NDI questionnaire, Visual analogue scale (VAS), goniometry, and plumb line measurement tool were used as baseline and assessment at the end of 3rd week. The data was analyzed on SPSS version 21. Descriptive analysis was performed. Independent t-test was used for between group comparison and paired t-test used for within group comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: After treatment within-group analysis of both NSE and NDE showed significant (p < 0.001) improvement in pain on VAS, all ROMs of the neck including flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion and left rotation, plumb line and NDI score with very large effect size. However, between-group analysis showed non-significant differences (p > 0.05) for post-treatment mean VAS, neck ROM, NDI and plumb line measurement.

Conclusion: Between NSE and NDE, no one is more beneficial than another. Both are equally effective in alleviating pain, increasing ROM, decreasing functional disability, and improving forward head posture in patients with NSNP.

Trial registration: Registered trial at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298631, 28/03/2022, prospectively registered.

Keywords: Isometric exercises; Isotonic exercises; Nonspecific neck pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Consort flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chin tuck
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cervical extension
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Shoulder shrugs
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Shoulder rolls
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Scapular retractions
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Cervical extension-dynamic isometric
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Cervical flexion-dynamic isometric
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Chest fly’s exercises

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gautam R, Dhamija JK, Puri A, Trivedi P, Sathiyavani D, Nambi G. Comparison of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization in improving neck pain, ROM and disability. Int J Physiother Res. 2014;2(3):561–6.
    1. Sbardella S, La Russa C, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Guarnera A, Pezzi L et al. Muscle energy technique in the rehabilitative treatment for acute and chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. In Healthcare 2021 Jun 17 (Vol. 9, No. 6, p. 746). MDPI. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ijaz A, Khan I, Ahmed A, Sadiq S. Frequency of neck pain among dentists. Pakistan Orthodontic J. 2016;8(2):89–93.
    1. Kaka B, Ogwumike OO. Effect of neck stabilization and dynamic exercises on pain, disability and fear avoidance beliefs in patients with non-specific neck pain. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:e704. 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3555 - DOI
    1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, et al. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1309–15. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data