Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;74(6):1471-1482.
doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Transfer Learning-Based Classifier to Automate the Extraction of False X-Ray Images From Hospital's Database

Affiliations

Transfer Learning-Based Classifier to Automate the Extraction of False X-Ray Images From Hospital's Database

Manar Abu Talib et al. Int Dent J. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: During preclinical training, dental students take radiographs of acrylic (plastic) blocks containing extracted patient teeth. With the digitisation of medical records, a central archiving system was created to store and retrieve all x-ray images, regardless of whether they were images of teeth on acrylic blocks, or those from patients. In the early stage of the digitisation process, and due to the immaturity of the data management system, numerous images were mixed up and stored in random locations within a unified archiving system, including patient record files. Filtering out and expunging the undesired training images is imperative as manual searching for such images is problematic. Hence the aim of this stidy was to differentiate intraoral images from artificial images on acrylic blocks.

Methods: An artificial intelligence (AI) solution to automatically differentiate between intraoral radiographs taken of patients and those taken of acrylic blocks was utilised in this study. The concept of transfer learning was applied to a dataset provided by a Dental Hospital.

Results: An accuracy score, F1 score, and a recall score of 98.8%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively, were achieved using a VGG16 pre-trained model. These results were more sensitive compared to those obtained initally using a baseline model with 96.5%, 97.5%, and 98.9% accuracy score, F1 score, and a recall score respectively.

Conclusions: The proposed system using transfer learning was able to accurately identify "fake" radiographs images and distinguish them from the real intraoral images.

Keywords: Dental radiographs images; Image processing; Transfer learning; VGG16.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest None disclosed.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Diagram showing the separation of the merged images datasets.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Dataset summary.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
Model flowchart diagram.
Fig 4
Fig. 4
Image preprocessing transformations.
Fig 5
Fig. 5
Visual representation of the transfer learning model based on VGG-16.
Fig 6
Fig. 6
(A) Average accuracy per epoch for 10 folds for the baseline model. (B) Average loss per epoch for 10 folds for the baseline model. (C) Average accuracy per epoch for 10 folds of the transfer learning model. (D) Average accuracy per epoch for 10 folds for the baseline model.
Fig 7
Fig. 7
(A) Confusion matrix of best-performing baseline model results on the test dataset. (B) Confusion matrix of best-performing transfer learning model on the test dataset.

References

    1. Brunner A.J., Hack E., Neuenschwander J. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. 2015. Nondestructive testing of polymers and polymer–matrix composites; pp. 1–39.
    1. Nair M.K., Pettigrew J.C., Loomis J.S., Bates R.E., Kostewicz S., Robinson B., et al. Enterprise-wide implementation of digital radiography in oral and maxillofacial imaging: the University of Florida Dentistry System. J. Digit. Imaging. 2009;22(3):232–241. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9149-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garg S., Singh P. 2020 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS) 2020. State-of-the-art review of deep learning for medical image analysis; pp. 421–427. - DOI
    1. Saba L., Biswas M., Kuppili V., Cuadrado Godia E., Suri H.S., Edla D.R., et al. The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019;114:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald R.J., Schwartz K.M., Eckel L.J., Diehn F.E., Hunt C.H., Bartholmai B.J., et al. The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Acad. Radiol. 2015;22(9):1191–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources