Standard operating protocol for utilizing energy-based devices in aesthetic practice
- PMID: 39233487
- PMCID: PMC11626368
- DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16510
Standard operating protocol for utilizing energy-based devices in aesthetic practice
Abstract
Background: Lasers and other energy-based devices are increasingly becoming popular in aesthetic practice. Many centers employ doctors or technicians to perform these procedures where treating doctor and operating doctor may be different. Hence the need for standard operative protocols, to be followed while performing these procedures to avoid mistakes, complications and to get optimum results. In the current review article, group of doctors who have worked with these energy-based devices over many years worked together and suggested the protocols to be followed for the most commonly used energy-based procedures.
Aim: To provide Standard operating protocols for the operator and staff to ensure, efficacy, safety, for the patient and for the devices.
Methods: The following protocols have been drafted based on the best practices followed by the authors in their clinics and reflect their consensus opinion. The objective is to provide operating protocols in a standard format, which can be of use by practicing dermatologists and their staff. The protocols include both general guidelines for the laser room and specific protocols for different machines. The draft follows the following schema: General instructions for all the energy-based devices. Specific protocols for different devices: Laser hair removal, fractional lasers, Q-switched lasers, fractional microneedling radiofrequency and cryolipolysis.
Conclusions: The protocols proposed help to maintain the uniformity and avoid complications. However, these instructions are generalized and not machine or lesion specific. There may be variations in the protocols depending on the treatment lesion and treating doctor as well as machine.
Keywords: MnRF; Q‐switched lasers; cryolipolysis; laser hair removal; laser safety.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Complications in lasers, lights, and radiofrequency devices.Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jun;28(3):340-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312701. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Facial Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22723236
-
Plume Effect of Fractional Radiofrequency Verus Laser Resurfacing: Considerations in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Jan;53(1):115-118. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23336. Epub 2020 Nov 8. Lasers Surg Med. 2021. PMID: 33161606
-
Home-use devices in aesthetic dermatology.Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Dec;33(4):198-204. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.0121. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2014. PMID: 25830253 Review.
-
Ensuring precise beard and eyebrow shaping with laser: Innovative use of tongue depressor.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019 Jan-Feb;85(1):114-115. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_115_18. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019. PMID: 30539799 No abstract available.
-
Lasers and light sources for the removal of unwanted hair.Clin Dermatol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):443-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.05.017. Clin Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17870522 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of the Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Cosmetic Laser and Light Equipment.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05013-5. Online ahead of print. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 40681905
References
-
- Nestor MS. Prophylaxis for and treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in laser and cosmetic surgery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4(6):s20‐s25. - PubMed
-
- Koay J, Orengo I. Application of local anesthetics in dermatologic surgery. Dermatologic Surg. 2002;28:143‐148. - PubMed
-
- Epstein RH, Halmi B, Lask GP. Anesthesia for cutaneous laser therapy. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13:21‐24. - PubMed
-
- Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Goltz RW, et al. Guidelines of care for local and regional anesthesia in cutaneous surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:504‐509. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
