Glycated haemoglobin variability and risk of renal function decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39233504
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.15861
Glycated haemoglobin variability and risk of renal function decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) variability and risk of renal function decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Research design and methods: A comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library (until 12 March 2024). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines were followed for this meta-analysis. HbA1c variability was presented as indices of the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), HbA1c variability score (HVS) and haemoglobin glycation index (HGI). This meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models.
Results: Eighteen studies met the objectives of this meta-analysis. The analyses showed positive associations between HbA1c variability and kidney function decline, with hazard ratio (HR) 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.38) for high versus low SD groups, HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.30-1.65) for CV groups, HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.10-1.57) for HVS groups and HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.05-2.23) for HGI groups. In addition, each 1% increase in SD and CV was linked to kidney function decline, with HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.17-1.35), and 1.13 (95% CI 1.03-1.23), respectively. Also, each 1-SD increase in SD of HbA1c was associated with deterioration in renal function, with HR 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.29).
Conclusions: The four HbA1c variability indicators were all positively associated with renal function decline progression; therefore, HbA1c variability might play an important and promising role in guiding glycaemic control targets and predicting kidney function decline progression in T2DM.
Keywords: HbA1c variability; meta‐analysis; renal function decline; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country‐level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119
-
- Jha V, Garcia‐Garcia G, Iseki K, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382:260‐272. doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(13)60687‐X
-
- Campbell RC, Sui X, Filippatos G, et al. Association of chronic kidney disease with outcomes in chronic heart failure: a propensity‐matched study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:186‐193. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn445
-
- So WY, Kong AP, Ma RC, et al. Glomerular filtration rate, cardiorenal end points, and all‐cause mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2046‐2052. doi:10.2337/dc06‐0248
-
- Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long‐term complications in insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977‐986. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
