Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 21:12:1415548.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415548. eCollection 2024.

Pregnant individuals perspectives towards receiving COVID-19 vaccination during their pregnancy: an in-depth qualitative study

Sanne J M Zilver  1   2 , Anna L Rietveld  1   2 , Noralie N Schonewille  3   4 , Petra C A M Bakker  1   2 , Birit F P Broekman  3   4   5 , Elisabeth van Leeuwen  1   2 , Christianne J M de Groot  1   2
Affiliations

Pregnant individuals perspectives towards receiving COVID-19 vaccination during their pregnancy: an in-depth qualitative study

Sanne J M Zilver et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant individuals have an increased risk of severe illness from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent severe illness and complications for pregnant individuals. Pregnant individuals are often excluded from research and remain hesitant to receive vaccination against COVID-19. It is pivotal to study factors related to vaccine uptake and hesitancy among pregnant individuals. We studied barriers and facilitators for pregnant individuals choice and motivation regarding vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy to aid future pregnant individuals in their decision to vaccinate against various infectious agents.

Methods: In this qualitative study, pregnant individuals were interviewed between October 2021 and January 2022 using a semi-structured approach. A topic list was used to explore their feelings, perceptions and ideas regarding vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analyses was performed using MAX QDA.

Results: After nine interviews, saturation was reached. Three main themes were identified that influenced pregnant individuals choice and motivation regarding vaccination: health consequences, ambiguity of information and societal motivation. Health consequences mainly concerned the effect for their offspring, and the unknown long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccination. The advice from the Dutch institute for Public Health and Environment changed from not vaccinating pregnant individuals after release of the developed vaccine, to routinely vaccinating all pregnant individuals after research data were available from the United States of America (USA). This change of policy fuelled doubt and confusion for vaccination. Arguments in favor of vaccination from the social perspective were specific behaviour rules and restrictions due to the pandemic. E.g. without vaccination people were unable to travel abroad and having to take a COVID-19 test every time entering a public place.

Conclusion: Pregnant individuals need clear, unambiguous information concerning health consequences, short- and long-term, particularly for their offspring, in the decision-making process regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, the societal perspective needs to be addressed. Besides the aforementioned themes, general counselling should focus on misperceptions of vaccine safety and the role of misinformation which are also important in the non-pregnant population. This study underlines the importance of including pregnant individuals in research programs to obtain specific information targeted to their needs.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; pregnancy; pregnant individuals; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline of lockdowns, start of vaccination and study period in Netherlands.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The central focus of the information (i) revolves around three primary themes: societal motivation, ambiguity of information and the health consequences for pregnant individuals all intertwined with each other.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. (2020) 277:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mishra NP, Das SS, Yadav S, Khan W, Afzal M, Alarifi A, et al. . Global impacts of pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic: focus on socio-economic consequences. Sens Int. (2020) 1:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100042, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pietrabissa G, Simpson SG. Psychological consequences of social isolation during COVID-19 outbreak. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:2201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sallam M. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines (Basel). (2021) 9:160. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Citu IM, Citu C, Gorun F, Motoc A, Gorun OM, Burlea B, et al. . Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among Romanian pregnant women. Vaccines (Basel). (2022) 10:275. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020275 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources