The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in cervical cancer assessed in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 39234448
- PMCID: PMC11370863
- DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2746
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in cervical cancer assessed in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Introduction: Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most commonly used imaging method in the assessment of the loco-regional extension in cervical cancer. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (abbreviated CEUS) is being investigated as an alternative or complement to the MRI investigation.
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of CEUS in identifying loco-regional invasion of cervical cancer compared to MRI, considered the accepted reference standard.
Methods: Sixty-one patients with histopathologically confirmed cervical cancer were investigated as part of the pre-treatment workup by CEUS and MRI. We calculated the accuracy and concordance of CEUS versus MRI for tumor invasion in the vagina, bladder, rectum, parametrium, and uterus. For the time-intensity curve associated parameters analyzed (TTPK, AUC, peak intensity, wash in and wash out gradient) we calculated sensitivity, specificity and threshold value of positivity, for tumor invasion at the above-mentioned sites, with graphical representation of the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve.
Results: CEUS was highly accurate in detecting bladder (93.4%, 95% CI: 87.2-99.6) and uterine invasion (88.5%, 95% CI: 80.5-96.5). Substantial agreement between CEUS and MRI was observed for invasion in the uterine body (k=0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-0.98) and bladder (k=0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.77). ROC curve analysis for loco-regional invasions showed that the wash in gradient at a cut-off value of 2.23 had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 67% in predicting uterine invasion.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate high accuracy and good agreement between CEUS and MRI regarding especially uterine and bladder invasion. This imaging method could help select patients in early stages for fertility sparing surgery, and also be of use in cases in which early bladder invasion is suspected.
Keywords: cervical cancer; contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; magnetic resonance imaging.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for evaluation of local invasion by cervical cancer.Br J Radiol. 2018 Nov;91(1091):20170858. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170858. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Br J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 30028181 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma.Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 May;55(5):1073-1079. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03410-2. Epub 2022 Nov 24. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023. PMID: 36422743
-
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.J Cancer Res Ther. 2021 Nov;17(5):1179-1185. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1056_21. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021. PMID: 34850765
-
Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Feb;42(3):739-749. doi: 10.1002/jum.16122. Epub 2022 Nov 2. J Ultrasound Med. 2023. PMID: 36321389
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.Curr Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;31(2):818-827. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020060. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38392054 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources