Clinico-biological factors predicting the benefit of the LV5FU2 maintenance strategy as a first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
- PMID: 39235326
- PMCID: PMC11379635
- DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae079
Clinico-biological factors predicting the benefit of the LV5FU2 maintenance strategy as a first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Abstract
Introduction: Predictive markers of LV5FU2 maintenance benefit after first-line induction with FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are necessary to select patients who will not be harmed by this strategy.
Patients and methods: We focused on patients who received 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (arm A, N = 88) or 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX followed by LV5FU2 maintenance in controlled patients (arm B, N = 91) from the PRODIGE-35 trial. Prognostic factors and predictors of efficiency were identified by using Cox regression. Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to deterioration of quality of life (TTD-QoL) were evaluated.
Results: Poor independent prognostic factors were primary tumor in place, age <65 years and the presence of liver metastases for PFS, a baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 and CA19.9 ≥500 UI/L for OS, independent of the treatment arm. Patients with one metastatic site had a longer PFS in arm A, whereas patients with ≥2 metastatic sites had a longer PFS in arm B. We also identified predictors of OS and TTD-QoL in arm B but these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Except for patients with one metastatic site who benefited more from 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, a maintenance strategy with LV5FU2 should be widely offered to mPC patients whose survival and QoL are preserved after 4 months of FOLFIRINOX. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02352337).
Keywords: chemotherapy; maintenance; metastases; pancreatic neoplasm.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Nicolas Williet reported financial relationships with Sanofi, Servier, and Ispen. Thomas Aparicio declared conferences for Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca; financial support to congress from Roche and Bayer; and advisory roles for Biogen and Servier. Yves Rinaldi reported financial relationships with Sanofi, Merck, Servier, Amgen, Roche and Bayer. Victoire Granger declared financial support for research from Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Servier, and Astellas; consultancy from Amgen, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Servier, and Pierre Fabre; and financial support for congresses from Amgen, Ipsen, Lilly, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Jean-Louis Legoux declared consulting and advisory fees from Novartis, research funding fees from Sanofi, Keocyt, Novartis, Pfizer, and honoraria from Ipsen, Merck-Serono. Thierry Lecomte declared consulting fees, lecture fees and travel accommodations from IPSEN; lecture fees from AstraZeneca. Emeric Boisteau, Laetitia Dahan, Karine Le Malicot, Jerome Desramé, Olivier Bouché, Caroline Petorin, David Malka, Christine Rebischung, Cédric Lecaille, Anthony Turpin, Anne-Laure Bignon, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Côme Lepage, Gael Deplanque, Mathieu Baconnier, Isabelle Bonnet, Jean-François Seitz, Eric François, and Astrid Lièvre declared no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
