Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;63(10):1002-1010.
doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02440-1. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

[Paradigm shift in systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma-antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Paradigm shift in systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma-antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors]

[Article in German]
Jozefina Casuscelli et al. Urologie. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma face a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment involves platinum-based combinations followed by avelumab maintenance therapy. Follow-up therapies include enfortumab vedotin, vinflunine, and taxanes.

Objective: To analyze new drug combinations in first-line and follow-up treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma concerning their clinical relevance, toxicities, and novel treatment sequences.

Materials and methods: Analysis of new study data from EV-302/KN-A39 (enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab) and CheckMate-901 (nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin) for untreated metastatic patients as well as TROPHY-U-01 (sacituzumab govitecan) and THOR (erdafitinib) for later lines.

Results: The new standard in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma is the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab. For cisplatin-eligible patients with contraindications to enfortumab vedotin, the combination of nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin offers an alternative. Erdafitinib presents a new biomarker-based option in the follow-up treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Conclusion: These novel combinations are revolutionizing the treatment standard for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and necessitate a new approach to managing side effects.

Zusammenfassung: HINTERGRUND: Patienten mit einem lokal fortgeschrittenen oder metastasierten Urothelkarzinom (mUC) haben eine schlechte Prognose. Standard in der Erstlinie ist eine Platin-basierte Kombination, gefolgt von einer Avelumab-Erhaltungstherapie. Zu den Folgetherapien gehören Enfortumab-Vedotin (EV), Vinflunin und Taxane.

Ziel der arbeit: Neue Substanzkombinationen in der Erstlinien- und Folgetherapien des mUC werden hinsichtlich ihrer klinischen Relevanz, Toxizitäten und neuer Therapiesequenz analysiert.

Material und methoden: Neue Studiendaten zu EV-302/KN-A39 (EV und Pembrolizumab) und CheckMate-901 (Nivolumab und Gemcitabin-Cisplatin) für unbehandelte, metastasierte Patienten sowie TROPHY-U-01 (Sacituzumab-Govitecan) und THOR (Erdafitinib) werden für spätere Therapielinien analysiert.

Ergebnisse: Neuer Standard in der Erstlinientherapie für Patienten mit einem mUC ist die Kombination aus EV und Pembrolizumab. Für Cisplatin-geeignete Patienten mit Kontraindikationen gegen EV ist die Kombination aus Nivolumab und Gemcitabin-Cisplatin eine Alternative. Erdafitinib stellt eine neue biomarkerbasierte Option in der Folgetherapie des mUC dar.

Schlussfolgerung: Die neuen Therapiekombinationen revolutionieren den Behandlungsstandard des mUC und machen ein neues Nebenwirkungsmanagement erforderlich.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; First-line treatment; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Sequential therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

Literatur

    1. Balar AV, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE et al (2017) Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet 389:67–76 - DOI
    1. Bellmunt J, Fougeray R, Rosenberg JE et al (2013) Long-term survival results of a randomized phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 24:1466–1472 - DOI
    1. Bellmunt J, Theodore C, Demkov T et al (2009) Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. J Clin Oncol 27:4454–4461 - DOI
    1. De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Mead G et al (2012) Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986. J Clin Oncol 30:191–199 - DOI
    1. Gilead.Com Pressemitteilung vom 31. Mai 2024.

Publication types

MeSH terms