Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study
- PMID: 39235538
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1
Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the accuracy and effectiveness among operators with different levels of experience in a robot-assisted immediate implant surgery.
Materials and methods: The study included four participants who had received dental training at the same institution but have varying levels of clinical experience in implant dentistry, denoted as undergraduate student (UG), dental resident (DR), specialist with no robot experience (IS) and specialist with robot experience (RS). Following comprehensive theoretical training in robot-assisted implant operation, each operator participated in five robotic-assisted implant procedures at 21 sites, resulting in the implant surgery of a total of 20 implants. Subsequently, the accuracy of the implants was assessed by analyzing the preoperative planning and the postoperative CBCT scans, and the time required for each procedure was also recorded.
Results: Angular deviation in UG, DR, IS and RS group was 0.82 ± 0.27°, 0.55 ± 0.27°, 0.83 ± 0.27°, and 0.56 ± 0.36°, respectively. The total deviation of the implant platform point was 0.28 ± 0.10 mm, 0.26 ± 0.16 mm, 0.34 ± 0.08 mm and 0.31 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. The total deviation of the apical point was 0.30 ± 0.08 mm, 0.25 ± 0.18 mm, 0.31 ± 0.09 mm, and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm, respectively. The time spent was 10.37 ± 0.57 min, 10.56 ± 1.77 min, 9.93 ± 0.78 min, and 11.76 ± 0.78 min for each operator. As the number of operations increased, the operation time decreased, but there was no significant difference in implant accuracy between the different groups.
Conclusions: Within the scope of this study, robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrated high accuracy, with no significant differences in performance between operators with varying levels of clinical experience or implant robot-user experience. Furthermore, the learning curve for robotic implant surgery is steep and consistent.
Clinical relevance: Robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrates consistent high accuracy across operators of varying clinical and robotic experience levels, highlighting its potential to standardize procedures and enhance predictability in clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Accuracy; Computer-assisted implant surgery; Immediate implant surgery; Learning curve; Robot-assisted surgery.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series.J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105035. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105035. Epub 2024 May 9. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 38734299
-
Accuracy, Safety, and Efficiency in Robotic-Assisted vs. Freehand Dental Implant Surgery: A 6-Month Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Trial.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May;36(5):662-670. doi: 10.1111/clr.14413. Epub 2025 Feb 3. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 39899324 Clinical Trial.
-
Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Dec;26(6):1279-1288. doi: 10.1111/cid.13383. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39302731
-
Accuracy assessment of robot-assisted implant surgery in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Oct;132(4):747.e1-747.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Jan 8. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 38195255
-
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies.Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024 Sep 1;32(3):287-300. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024. PMID: 38691616
Cited by
-
Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery in clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05837-2. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40217233 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M (2012) Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 23 suppl 6:112 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
-
- Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A (2019) The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. J Clin Periodontol 46:949–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13160 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Miller RJ, Bier J (2006) Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent 15:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202637.61180.2b - DOI - PubMed
-
- D’Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A (2017) Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000 73:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12175
-
- Jorba-García A, González-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E (2021) Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 25:2479–2494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials