Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 5;409(1):270.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03452-3.

Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis

Qasi Najah et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications.

Results: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29).

Conclusions: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations.

Keywords: Appendiceal stump; Appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Network meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Cervellin G, Mora R, Ticinesi A, Meschi T, Comelli I, Catena F, Lippi G (2016) Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases. Ann transl med 4(19):362 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Ilves I, Fagerström A, Herzig K-H, Juvonen P, Miettinen P, Paajanen H (2014) Seasonal variations of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain in Finland. World J Gastroenterology: WJG 20:4037 - PMC - DOI
    1. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, Boermeester M, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Tarasconi A (2020) Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 15:1–42 - DOI
    1. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212 discussion 212 – 203 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Gomes CA, Junior CS, de Peixoto RO, Netto JM, Gomes CC, Gomes FC (2013) Appendiceal stump closure by metal endoclip in the management of complicated acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 8:35 - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources