Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Nov;48(11):2873-2879.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06290-6. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Pedobarography and ankle-foot kinematics in children with symptomatic flexible flatfoot after medialising calcaneal osteotomy and controls: a comparative study

Phatcharapa Osateerakun  1   2 , Panapol Varakornpipat  3 , Kittigon Seehaboot  2 , Noppachart Limpaphayom  4   5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pedobarography and ankle-foot kinematics in children with symptomatic flexible flatfoot after medialising calcaneal osteotomy and controls: a comparative study

Phatcharapa Osateerakun et al. Int Orthop. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Flexible flatfoot (FF) can interrupt children's activity through uneven pressure distribution to the medial column of the foot and may require surgery. Medialising calcaneal osteotomy (MCO) helps restore the foot‒tripod complex. The objective was to compare pedobarography and ankle‒foot kinematics in children with symptomatic FF after MCO to those in controls.

Methods: Gait analysis was performed on 21 children with FF (37 feet, age 13.7 ± 4.9 years) 4.5 ± 3.4 years after MCO and on 21 controls (42 feet, age 12.1 ± 1.1 years). Ankle‒foot kinematics and pedobarography parameters (maximum pressure, impulse, contact area, and percentage of contact time in the stance phase) of ten anatomic foot regions from an average of five gait trials were compared. The functional outcome was determined by the AOFAS-AHFS score in the FF group.

Results: The average AOFAS-AHFS score was 96. The FF group had a larger contact area and expressed more force on the medial column of the foot. The maximum pressure, impulse, contact area, and percentage of contact time in the stance phase in the midfoot region for the FF and control groups were 0.66 ± 0.5 vs. 0.24 ± 0.4 N/cm2 (p = 0.005), 0.12 ± 0.1 vs. 0.03 ± 0.1 Ns/cm2 (p = 0.02), 47.1 ± 13.4 vs. 30.1 ± 7.1 cm2 (p < 0.001), and 53.7 ± 17.4 vs. 68.2 ± 15.7% (p = 0.007), respectively. The kinematics of the FF exhibited a greater range of abduction and eversion during the mid- and terminal-stance phases of the gait cycle.

Conclusions: The MCO procedure did not normalise the pressure on the midfoot in FF to the level of that in the controls, and the deformity persisted in the forefoot.

Keywords: Comparative study; Flatfoot; Gait analysis; Kinematics; Osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Biz C, Cerchiaro M, Mori F, Rossin A, Ponticiello M, Crimi A et al (2023) Flatfoot over the centuries: the background of current conservative and operative treatments. Int Orthop 47(9):2357–2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05837-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krogman W (1951) The scars of human evolution. Sci Am 185(6):54–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1251-54 - DOI
    1. Filardi V (2018) Flatfoot and normal foot a comparative analysis of the stress shielding. J Orthop 15(3):820–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.002 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ueki Y, Sakuma E, Wada I (2019) Pathology and management of flexible flat foot in children. J Orthop Sci 24(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.09.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan F, Chevidikunnan MF, BinMulayh EA, Al-Lehidan NS (2023) Plantar pressure distribution in the evaluation and differentiation of flatfeet. Gait Posture 101:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.01.019 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources