Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431722.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31722.

Circulating Tumor DNA and Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Circulating Tumor DNA and Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kyle Dickinson et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) poses a substantial clinical challenge despite advancements in diagnosis and treatment. While tissue biopsies offer a static snapshot of disease, liquid biopsy-through detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-provides minimally invasive, real-time insight into tumor biology.

Objective: To determine the association between ctDNA and survival outcomes in patients with MBC.

Data sources: An electronic search was performed in 5 databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science) and included all articles published from inception until October 23, 2023.

Study selection: To be included in the meta-analysis, studies had to (1) include women diagnosed with MBC; (2) report baseline plasma ctDNA data; and (3) report overall survival, progression-free survival, or disease-free survival with associated hazards ratios.

Data extraction and synthesis: Titles and abstracts were screened independently by 2 authors. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, and quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary study outcome was the association between detection of specific genomic alterations in ctDNA with survival outcomes. Secondary objectives were associations of study methodology with survival.

Results: Of 3162 articles reviewed, 37 met the inclusion criteria and reported data from 4264 female patients aged 20 to 94 years. Aggregated analysis revealed a significant association between ctDNA detection and worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.58). Subgroup analysis identified significant associations of TP53 and ESR1 alterations with worse survival (hazard ratios, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.34-1.81] and 1.28 [95% CI, 0.96-1.60], respectively), while PIK3CA alterations were not associated with survival outcomes. Stratifying by detection method, ctDNA detection through next-generation sequencing and digital polymerase chain reaction was associated with worse survival (hazard ratios, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.22-1.74] and 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.50], respectively).

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, detection of specific genomic alterations in ctDNA was associated with worse overall, progression-free, and disease-free survival, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker in MBC. These results may help guide the design of future studies to determine the actionability of ctDNA findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Flow Diagram of the Literature Search and Study Selection
ctDNA indicates circulating tumor DNA; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Visual Summary of Study Characteristics
cfDNA indicates cell-free DNA; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; DFS, disease-free survival; dPCR, digital polymerase chain reaction; HR, hormone receptor; NGS, next-generation sequencing; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang R, Zhu Y, Liu X, Liao X, He J, Niu L. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with different metastatic sites in stage IV breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;12(1):1091. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shachar SS, Mashiach T, Fried G, et al. . Biopsy of breast cancer metastases: patient characteristics and survival. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):7. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-3014-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stejskal P, Goodarzi H, Srovnal J, Hajdúch M, van ’t Veer LJ, Magbanua MJM. Circulating tumor nucleic acids: biology, release mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):15. doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01710-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rinaldi J, Sokol ES, Hartmaier RJ, et al. . The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer: insights from 11,000 tumors. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0231999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231999 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai H, Yu J, Jia S, Liu X, Liang X, Li H. Prognostic value of the TP53 mutation location in metastatic breast cancer as detected by next-generation sequencing. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:3303-3316. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S298729 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types