Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Oct;15(5):2094-2103.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13557. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

The impact of mobility limitations on geriatric rehabilitation outcomes: Positive effects of resistance exercise training (RESORT)

Laure M G Verstraeten  1 , Esmee M Reijnierse  2   3 , Thom Spoelstra  1 , Carel G M Meskers  4 , Andrea B Maier  1   2   5   6
Affiliations
Observational Study

The impact of mobility limitations on geriatric rehabilitation outcomes: Positive effects of resistance exercise training (RESORT)

Laure M G Verstraeten et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Regaining walking ability is a key target in geriatric rehabilitation. This study evaluated the prevalence of walking ability at (pre-)admission and related clinical characteristics in a cohort of geriatric rehabilitation inpatients; in inpatients without walking ability, feasibility and effectiveness of progressive resistance exercise training (PRT) were assessed.

Methods: Inpatients within RESORT, an observational, longitudinal cohort of geriatric rehabilitation inpatients, were stratified in those with and without ability to walk independently (defined by Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) score ≤ 2) at admission; further subdivision was performed by pre-admission walking ability. Clinical characteristics at admission, length of stay, and changes in physical and functional performance throughout admission were compared depending on (pre-)admission walking ability. Feasibility (relative number of PRT sessions given and dropout rate) and effectiveness [change in Short Physical Performance Battery, FAC, independence in (instrumental) activities of daily living (ADL/IADL)] of PRT (n = 11) in a subset of inpatients without ability to walk independently at admission (able to walk pre-admission) were investigated compared with usual care (n = 11) (LIFT-UP study).

Results: Out of 710 inpatients (median age 83.5 years; 58.0% female), 52.2% were not able to walk independently at admission, and 7.6% were not able to walk pre-admission. Inpatients who were not able to walk independently at admission, had a longer length of stay, higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and frailty and malnutrition risk scores, and a lower improvement in independence in (I)ADL compared with inpatients who were able to walk at both admission and pre-admission. In LIFT-UP, the relative median number of PRT sessions given compared with the protocol (twice per weekday) was 11 out of 44. There were no dropouts. PRT improved FAC (P = 0.028) and ADL (P = 0.034) compared with usual care.

Conclusions: High prevalence of inpatients who are not able to walk independently and its negative impact on independence in (I)ADL during geriatric rehabilitation highlights the importance of tailored interventions such as PRT, which resulted in improvement in FAC and ADL.

Keywords: Aged; Dependent ambulation; Physical functional performance; Rehabilitation; Resistance training; Walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andrea B. Maier reports grants from Danone Nutricia Research outside the conduct of the study. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of RESORT patients included in LIFT‐UP. FAC, Functional Ambulation Classification; PRT, progressive resistance exercise training.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of walking ability pre‐admission (before acute hospital admission) and at admission to geriatric rehabilitation (n = 710).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gazineo D, Godino L, Decaro R, Calogero P, Pinto D, Chiari P, et al. Assisted walking program on walking ability in in‐hospital geriatric patients: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021;69:637–643. - PubMed
    1. Viosca E, Martínez JL, Almagro PL, Gracia A, González C. Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1234–1238. - PubMed
    1. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1263–1270. - PubMed
    1. Smit EB, Bouwstra H, Hertogh CM, Wattel EM, van der Wouden JC. Goal‐setting in geriatric rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Rehabil 2019;33:395–407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu CL, Lee TH, Chen YP, Ro LS, Hsu JL, Chu YC, et al. Recovery of walking ability in stroke patients through postacute care rehabilitation. Biom J 2023;46:100550. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources