Physiological and perceptual response to critical power anchored HIIT: a sex comparison study
- PMID: 39237622
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05600-5
Physiological and perceptual response to critical power anchored HIIT: a sex comparison study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that using threshold-based high intensity interval training (HIITTHR) prescribed at an intensity above critical power (CP) in males and females matched for maximal oxygen uptake ( O2max) (mL/kg lean mass/min) will yield no sex differences in time to fatigue.
Methods: Thirteen males (mean ± SD: 22.0 ± 2.48 years, 181 ± 8.36 cm, 78.8 ± 11.4 kg) and eleven females (mean ± SD: 22.4 ± 2.69 years, 170 ± 5.73 cm, 65.2 ± 7.66 kg) initially undertook an incremental test to exhaustion to determine O2max, and a CP test. Then, one HIIT session (4 min on, 2 min off) was performed to exhaustion at the work rate associated with 105%CP. Acute physiological and cardiovascular responses were recorded.
Results: No sex differences were recorded in time to fatigue [Female vs. Male (min): 36.0 ± 18.5 vs. 39.3 ± 16.3], heart rate, rate of perceived exertion, or %oxygenated [haem]. Females displayed lower %deoxygenated [haem] at the end of interval 1, 2, 3, and 4 [Female vs. Male (%): 89.4 ± 21.2 vs. 110 ± 27.3, 92.0 ± 21.5 vs. 115 ± 27.6, 87.1 ± 23.7 vs. 112 ± 22.8, 88.9 ± 26.3 vs. 113 ± 23.5]. Large interindividual variability in performance, and physiological and perceptual response were present despite the use of threshold-based prescription.
Conclusion: The present study suggests that threshold-based prescription may help standardize the mean response exercise across sexes but does not eliminate physiological or perceptual variability. Furthermore, the lack of sex differences in TTF was accompanied by greater %deoxy[haem] in males, indicating tissue oxygenation is an unlikely determinant of HIIT performance. This study has been retrospectively registered at Trial Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KZVGC January 17th, 2023, following data collection but prior to data analyses.
Keywords: Critical power; Intermittent exercise; Sex comparison; Threshold-based prescription.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Ethical approval: This study was approved by The Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (ref. no: 6003260) and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. The participants consented to the publication of their results.
Similar articles
-
Conventional methods to prescribe exercise intensity are ineffective for exhaustive interval training.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Aug;123(8):1655-1670. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05176-6. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36988672 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Psychological and Physiological Effects of Varying the Volume of High-Intensity Interval Training in Healthy Men.Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Feb;126(1):119-142. doi: 10.1177/0031512518809734. Epub 2018 Nov 21. Percept Mot Skills. 2019. PMID: 30463479 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Responses Between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High-Intensity Interval Training.J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Aug;32(8):2130-2138. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002154. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 28737586
-
Acute performance fatigability following continuous versus intermittent cycling protocols is not proportional to total work done.Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Aug 1;49(8):1055-1067. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0503. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024. PMID: 38631044 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training in Combat Sports: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Mar;34(3):888-900. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003255. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 31904713
Cited by
-
Fitness, endurance, and : can men and women of same aerobic power be compared in critical-power-anchored HIIT performance?Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun;125(6):1735-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05789-z. Epub 2025 Apr 10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025. PMID: 40210727 No abstract available.
-
Response: Fitness, endurance, and VO2max: Can men and women of same aerobic power be compared in critical-power-anchored HIIT performance?Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jul;125(7):2031-2032. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05816-z. Epub 2025 May 20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025. PMID: 40392268 No abstract available.
References
-
- Albert W, Wrigley A, McLean R, Sleivert G (2006) Sex differences in the rate of fatigue development and recovery. Dyn Med 5(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-5-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ansdell P, Thomas K, Howatson G, Hunter S, Goodall S (2017) Contraction intensity and sex differences in knee-extensor fatigability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 37:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ansdell P, Brownstein CG, Škarabot J, Hicks KM, Howatson G, Thomas K, Hunter SK, Goodall S (2019) Sex differences in fatigability and recovery relative to the intensity–duration relationship. J Physiol 597(23):5577–5595. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP278699 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ansdell P, Škarabot J, Atkinson E, Corden S, Tygart A, Hicks KM, Thomas K, Hunter SK, Howatson G, Goodall S (2020) Sex differences in fatigability following exercise normalised to the power–duration relationship. J Physiol 598(24):5717–5737. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280031 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barker T, Poole DC, Noble ML, Barstow TJ (2006) Human critical power–oxygen uptake relationship at different pedalling frequencies. Exp Physiol 91(3):621–632. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032789 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous