Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 5;7(1):233.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0.

Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension

Affiliations

Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension

Faris Gulamali et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000-2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020-2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80-0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0-75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5-74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0-74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84; P < 0.05 for all).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

aICP is the subject of a provisional patent application (Application No. 63/626,051) filed with the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, in which F.G., A.S., N.D., I.S.H., and G.N.N. are named inventors. Dr Girish Nadkarni is an Associate Editor for npj Digital Medicine. He had no role in editorial decisions about this manuscript. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Preprocessing of datasets and development of the aICP model.
a Schema for AICP (i) Initial dataset (ii) Filtering by monitoring modality (iii) Filtering waveforms (iv) Final dataset. b Model Architecture, Training, and Output.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Performance of the aICP model.
a AUROC curve on the internal (MIMIC-ICP) and external (MSH-ICP) test cohorts. b AUPRC curve for internal (MIMIC-ICP) and external (MSH-ICP) test cohorts.

References

    1. Fernando, S. M. et al. Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ366, l4225 (2019). 10.1136/bmj.l4225 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawryluk, G. W. J. et al. Intracranial pressure: current perspectives on physiology and monitoring. Intensive Care Med.48, 1471–1481 (2022). 10.1007/s00134-022-06786-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Roux, P. et al. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Neurocrit. Care21, 1–26 (2014).10.1007/s12028-014-0041-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robba, C. et al. Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study. Crit. Care24, 1–10 (2020). 10.1186/s13054-020-03105-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Müller, S. J. et al. Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. J. Clin. Med. Res.12, 2209 (2023). - PMC - PubMed