Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66237.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.66237. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment

Affiliations

Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment

Guru Vishnu et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction A space between the prepared tooth and the cemented crown can cause microleakage, allowing microorganisms to enter, which in turn leads to the breakdown of the luting cement. To achieve an optimum fit, several factors should be considered, including the type of crown used, the taper of tooth preparation, and the type of cementing agent. Aim The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the microleakage of zirconia crowns cemented with glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), and self-adhesive resin cement. Materials Forty-five primary mandibular molars were divided into three groups: Group I receiving GIC, Group II receiving RMGIC, and Group III receiving self-adhesive resin cement. These cements were used to lute the teeth with Kedo zirconia crowns. The restored samples underwent thermal cycling and were assessed for microleakage under a stereomicroscope. For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 23.0 was used. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. Analytical statistics, including the Mann Whitney U test, were used to assess the differences in the level of microleakage between the groups at p < 0.05. Results The Mann Whitney U test revealed no significant difference in the level of microleakage between GIC and RMGIC (p = 0.072). However, self-adhesive resin cement showed significantly less microleakage than GIC (p = 0.000). Similarly, when comparing RMGIC and self-adhesive resin cement, the latter showed significantly less microleakage than the former (p = 0.001). Conclusion Microleakage of Kedo zirconia crowns on mandibular first molars was highest when luted with GIC, followed by RMGIC, and was least when luted with self-adhesive resin cement.

Keywords: crowns; luting cement; milk teeth; primary molars; thermocycling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Scientific Review Board issued approval SRB/SDC/PEDO-2105/23/159. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Assessment of microleakage using various luting agents: A - Using glass ionomer cement; B - Using resin-modified glass ionomer cement; C - Using self-adhesive resin cement.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zirconia in dentistry: part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. https://www.studiodent.gr/images/studies/zirconia/Zirconia-in-dentistry-.... Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009;4:130–151. - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars. Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:1418–1423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stress distribution in pediatric zirconia crowns depending on different tooth preparation and cement type: a finite element analysis. Chung SY, Lee H, Chae YK, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:550. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:3275–3280. - PubMed
    1. A practice-based clinical evaluation of the survival and success of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 5-year results. Rinke S, Kramer K, Bürgers R, Roediger M. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:136–144. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources