Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment
- PMID: 39238743
- PMCID: PMC11375106
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66237
Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment
Abstract
Introduction A space between the prepared tooth and the cemented crown can cause microleakage, allowing microorganisms to enter, which in turn leads to the breakdown of the luting cement. To achieve an optimum fit, several factors should be considered, including the type of crown used, the taper of tooth preparation, and the type of cementing agent. Aim The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the microleakage of zirconia crowns cemented with glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), and self-adhesive resin cement. Materials Forty-five primary mandibular molars were divided into three groups: Group I receiving GIC, Group II receiving RMGIC, and Group III receiving self-adhesive resin cement. These cements were used to lute the teeth with Kedo zirconia crowns. The restored samples underwent thermal cycling and were assessed for microleakage under a stereomicroscope. For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 23.0 was used. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. Analytical statistics, including the Mann Whitney U test, were used to assess the differences in the level of microleakage between the groups at p < 0.05. Results The Mann Whitney U test revealed no significant difference in the level of microleakage between GIC and RMGIC (p = 0.072). However, self-adhesive resin cement showed significantly less microleakage than GIC (p = 0.000). Similarly, when comparing RMGIC and self-adhesive resin cement, the latter showed significantly less microleakage than the former (p = 0.001). Conclusion Microleakage of Kedo zirconia crowns on mandibular first molars was highest when luted with GIC, followed by RMGIC, and was least when luted with self-adhesive resin cement.
Keywords: crowns; luting cement; milk teeth; primary molars; thermocycling.
Copyright © 2024, Vishnu et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Scientific Review Board issued approval SRB/SDC/PEDO-2105/23/159. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconia Crown Systems Using Self-Adhesive Resin, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, and Glass Ionomer Cements: A Stereomicroscopic In Vitro Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4432-S4435. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_890_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 40061737 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Microleakage in Nanocomposite and Amalgam as a Crown Foundation Material Luted with Different Luting Cements under CAD-CAM Milled Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Microscopic Study.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;14(13):2609. doi: 10.3390/polym14132609. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35808655 Free PMC article.
-
Microleakage of luting cements in CAD/CAM pediatric zirconia crowns: an in vitro study.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 26;14(1):29295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81088-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39592840 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):1328. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06671-2. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40817232 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016. PMID: 27843249 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Zirconia in dentistry: part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. https://www.studiodent.gr/images/studies/zirconia/Zirconia-in-dentistry-.... Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009;4:130–151. - PubMed
-
- Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial. Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:3275–3280. - PubMed
-
- A practice-based clinical evaluation of the survival and success of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 5-year results. Rinke S, Kramer K, Bürgers R, Roediger M. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:136–144. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources