Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 6.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006525. Online ahead of print.

Prediction of Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS) By Intraoperative Frozen Section for Patients with cT1N0M0 Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Center Observational Study (ECTOP-1016)

Affiliations

Prediction of Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS) By Intraoperative Frozen Section for Patients with cT1N0M0 Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Center Observational Study (ECTOP-1016)

Hang Cao et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of intraoperative assessment of spread through air spaces (STAS) on frozen sections (FS) in peripheral small-sized lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: Surgical decision-making based on FS diagnosis of STAS may be useful to prevent local control failure after sublobar resection.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of consecutive patients with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma to evaluate the accuracy of FS for the intraoperative detection of STAS. The final pathology (FP) diagnosis of STAS was based on corresponding permanent paraffin sections.

Results: This study included 878 patients with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 833 cases (95%) were assessable for STAS on FS. 26.4% of the cases evaluated positive for STAS on FP, whereas 18.2% on FS. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FS diagnosis of STAS were 85.1%, 56.4%, and 95.4%, respectively, with moderate agreement (κ=0.575). Inter-observer agreement was substantial (κ=0.756) among the three pathologists. Subgroup analysis based on tumor size or consolidation-to-tumor ratio all showed moderate agreement for concordance. After rigorous reassessment of false-positive cases, the presence of artifacts may be the main cause of interpretation errors. Additionally, true positive cases showed more high-grade histological patterns and more advanced p-TNM stages than false negative cases.

Conclusions: This is the largest prospective observational study to evaluate STAS on FS in patients with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma. FS is highly specific with moderate agreement, but is not sensitive for STAS detection. While appropriately reporting STAS on FS may provide surgeons with valuable information for intraoperative decision-making, better approaches are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources