Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb;12(1):688-694.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15069. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in acute heart failure: The P-Value-AHF study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in acute heart failure: The P-Value-AHF study

Julia Baumberger et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: Diuretic resistance (i.e., insufficient diuretic and natriuretic response to an appropriate dose of intravenously administered loop diuretic) is a major cause of insufficient decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF). Early assessment of diuretic and natriuretic response already after the first administration of loop diuretic is currently recommended, but few data exist on the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in AHF. The aim of this sub-study of the P-Value-AHF randomized clinical trial was to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of upfront diuretic resistance in patients presenting with AHF in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of AHF, ≥1 sign of congestion, and NT-proBNP >1000 ng/L between February and June 2024 were prospectively screened. Loop diuretics were administered per protocol: 40 mg furosemide i.v. in diuretic-naïve patients and those on oral torasemide <40 mg, 80 mg furosemide i.v. in patients on oral torasemide ≥40 mg daily. Urine output was measured over the following 2 h and in patients with urine volume <300 mL, urine sodium concentration was additionally measured in a spot sample. Upfront diuretic resistance was defined as urine volume <300 mL in 2 h and urine sodium concentration <70 mmol/L.

Results: From a total of 127 screened AHF patients presenting to the ED, 17 subjects were excluded after denial of informed consent and 17 could not be treated according to the protocol due to one or more exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 93 per-protocol-treated patients, 91 showed an adequate diuretic response either in terms of urine volume or urine sodium concentration. Only two of 93 patients (2.2%) met the criteria of upfront diuretic resistance. In a post-hoc analysis, patients with diuretic resistance had higher prevalence of chronic kidney or liver diseases, markedly lower blood pressure and heart rate, markedly higher serum creatinine and potassium levels, and lower serum sodium. Notably, clinical signs of congestion, circulating NT-proBNP, and left-ventricular ejection fraction were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Upfront diuretic resistance in an unselected population of AHF patients presenting to the ED affects only a minority of patients. These data highlight the importance of a standardized, protocolized approach to decongestive treatment in AHF, which includes the rapid administration of loop diuretics in an adequate dose. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease and high creatinine levels were more prevalent in patients with diuretic resistance.

Keywords: Acute heart failure; Decongestion; Diuresis; Diuretic resistance; Natriuresis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Julia Baumberger, Sabine Dinges, Eleonora Lupi, Thomas Wolters, Melina Stüssi‐Helbling, Pietro E. Cippà, Antonio Bellasi, Lars C. Huber, and Mattia Arrigo declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the study population and diuretic response. AHF, acute heart failure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; JVP, jugular venous pressure; UNa, urine sodium concentration; UVol, urine volume.

References

    1. Arrigo M, Jessup M, Mullens W, Reza N, Shah AM, Sliwa K, et al. Acute heart failure. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:16. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chioncel O, Mebazaa A, Maggioni AP, Harjola VP, Rosano G, Laroche C, et al. Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status ‐ impact of the clinical classification on in‐hospital and long‐term outcomes; insights from the ESC‐EORP‐HFA heart failure long‐term registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2019;21:1338–1352. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mullens W, Dauw J, Martens P, Verbrugge FH, Nijst P, Meekers E, et al. Acetazolamide in acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1185–1195. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203094 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrigo M, Parissis JT, Akiyama E, Mebazaa A. Understanding acute heart failure: pathophysiology and diagnosis. Eur Heart J Suppl 2016;18:G11–G18. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/suw044 - DOI

Publication types