Telescoping Flow Diverters for the Treatment of Brain Aneurysms: Indications and Outcome

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have reported the impact of telescoping flow diverters (FDs) in intracranial aneurysm treatment. Our study compared aneurysms treated using telescoping FDs to those treated with a single FD and identified predictors of telescoping.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of aneurysms treated with FDs between 2011 and 2023. All patients who were treated with FDs for intracranial aneurysms were included in the study.

Results: The study comprised 750 patients with 750 aneurysms treated using 871 FDs. The study cohort was divided into 85 patients requiring telescoping FDs and 655 who did not. Rates of hemorrhage (7.1% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001), symptomatic stroke (5.9% vs. 2.6, P < 0.001), and asymptomatic stroke (1.2% vs. 0.8%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the telescoping cohorts. At final follow-up, the rate of nonocclusion (9.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.029) and the rate of complete occlusion (88.5% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.029) were significantly higher in the telescoping cohort. On multivariate analysis, fusiform morphology (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-5.0, P = 0.03), increasing aneurysm height (OR: 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, P= 0.034), and the use of the Pipeline Embolization Device FD (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.4, P = 0.005) were independent predictors of telescoping.

Conclusions: Aneurysms with fusiform morphology, increasing aneurysm height and those that underwent flow diversion using Pipeline Embolization Device had higher odds for telescoping. Significantly higher rates of angiographic occlusion with the use of telescoping FD add to the literature on its efficacy in treating aneurysms of varying morphology.

Keywords: Flow diversion; Fusiform; Intracranial aneurysms; Pipeline Embolization Device; Telescoping.