Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct;10(10):969-985.
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

CD4+ T cells in antitumor immunity

Affiliations
Review

CD4+ T cells in antitumor immunity

Elena Montauti et al. Trends Cancer. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Advances in cancer immunotherapy have transformed cancer care and realized unprecedented responses in many patients. The growing arsenal of novel therapeutics - including immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), adoptive T cell therapies (ACTs), and cancer vaccines - reflects the success of cancer immunotherapy. The therapeutic benefits of these treatment modalities are generally attributed to the enhanced quantity and quality of antitumor CD8+ T cell responses. Nevertheless, CD4+ T cells are now recognized to play key roles in both the priming and effector phases of the antitumor immune response. In addition to providing T cell help through co-stimulation and cytokine production, CD4+ T cells can also possess cytotoxicity either directly on MHC class II-expressing tumor cells or to other cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The presence of specific populations of CD4+ T cells, and their intrinsic plasticity, within the TME can represent an important determinant of clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Understanding how the antitumor functions of specific CD4+ T cell types are induced while limiting their protumorigenic attributes will enable more successful immunotherapies.

Keywords: CD4(+) T lymphocytes; antigen-presenting cells; cancer immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests L.F. received research funding from Abbvie, Bavarian Nordic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dendreon, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Roche/Genentech, and Parker Institute; served as a consultant to Abbvie, Actym, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Atreca, Bioatla, Bolt, Bristol Myer Squibb, Crescendo, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunogenesis, Innovent, Merck, NGMBio, Nutcracker, RAPT, Senti, Sutro, and Roche/Genentech; and has ownership interests in Actym, Atreca, Bioatla, Bolt, Immunogenesis, Nutcracker, RAPT, and Senti, unrelated to this review.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The differentiation pathways of CD4+CTLs. Multiple subsets of CD4+ T cells can acquire cytotoxic capabilities through a combination of the following pathways: 1) TCR signal strength or duration can lead to downstream upregulation of EOMES-mediated cytotoxicity related genes; 2) 3) IL-2 signaling can augment CRTAM-mediated EOMES upregulation; 3) Type I IFN can signal through STAT2 to upregulate both T-BET and BLIMP-1, leading to upregulation of cytotoxic genes; and 4) Cytokines IL-2 and IL-15 can signal through STAT5 to upregulate BLIMP-1 independently of Type I IFN signaling.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. CD4+ T cells can exert their anti-tumor effects through both direct and indirect mechanisms.
A, Environmental cues facilitate CD4+ cytotoxic lymphocyte (CD4+CTL) differentiation through multiple pathways, including cytokine production, ligand expression, and TCR signal strength. Thus, CD4+CTL differentiation can be curated based on environmental needs. These pathways can work independently from one another, and potentially may synergize for optimal cytotoxic induction through FAS/FASL signaling, and cytotoxic granzyme (GZM) and perforin (PRF) secretion. B, many of the indirect anti-tumor functions of CD4+ T cells are though cytokine secretion, which can recruit and activate cytotoxic immune cells including macrophages (mf), dendritic cells (DC), B cells, and NK cells to induce tumor cell death.

References

    1. Kwek SS, et al. (2015) Preexisting Levels of CD4 T Cells Expressing PD-1 Are Related to Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol. 3(9),1008–1016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kagamu H, et al. (2020) CD4+ T-cell Immunity in the Peripheral Blood Correlates with Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 8(3),334–344. - PubMed
    1. Laheurte C, et al. (2019) Distinct prognostic value of circulating anti-telomerase CD4+ Th1 immunity and exhausted PD-1+/TIM-3+ T cells in lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 121(5),405–416. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martens A, et al. (2016) Increases in Absolute Lymphocytes and Circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells Are Associated with Positive Clinical Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab. Clin. Cancer Res. 22(19),4848–4858. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, et al. (2018) Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. Nature. 564(7735),268–272. - PubMed

References for Table 1

    1. Zaidi MR (2019) The Interferon-Gamma Paradox in Cancer. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 39(1),30–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montfort A, et al. (2019) The TNF Paradox in Cancer Progression and Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 10,1818. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pang F, et al. (2023) Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Polyadenylation Events Associated with the Tumor ImmuneMicroenvironment in Colon Adenocarcinoma. Curr. Genom. 24(1),48–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang T, et al. (2023) Clinical significance and changes to the immune microenvironment of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 0(0),0–0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sissy CE, et al. (2020) A Diagnostic Biopsy-Adapted Immunoscore Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment and Selects Patients with Rectal Cancer Eligible for a Watch-and-Wait Strategy. Clin. Cancer Res. 26(19),5198–5207. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances