Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 6;13(1):228.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02646-6.

Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? : Protocol for a systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making

Christoph Wilhelm  1   2 , Anke Steckelberg  3 , Felix G Rebitschek  4   5
Affiliations

Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? : Protocol for a systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making

Christoph Wilhelm et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Algorithmic decision-making (ADM) utilises algorithms to collect and process data and develop models to make or support decisions. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of support systems that can be superior to medical professionals without AI support in certain tasks. However, whether patients can benefit from this remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the current evidence on patient-relevant benefits and harms, such as improved survival rates and reduced treatment-related complications, when healthcare professionals use ADM systems (developed using or working with AI) compared to healthcare professionals without AI-related ADM (standard care)-regardless of the clinical issues.

Methods: Following the PRISMA statement, MEDLINE and PubMed (via PubMed), Embase (via Elsevier) and IEEE Xplore will be searched using English free text terms in title/abstract, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and Embase Subject Headings (Emtree fields). Additional studies will be identified by contacting authors of included studies and through reference lists of included studies. Grey literature searches will be conducted in Google Scholar. Risk of bias will be assessed by using Cochrane's RoB 2 for randomised trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomised trials. Transparent reporting of the included studies will be assessed using the CONSORT-AI extension statement. Two researchers will screen, assess and extract from the studies independently, with a third in case of conflicts that cannot be resolved by discussion.

Discussion: It is expected that there will be a substantial shortage of suitable studies that compare healthcare professionals with and without ADM systems concerning patient-relevant endpoints. This can be attributed to the prioritisation of technical quality criteria and, in some cases, clinical parameters over patient-relevant endpoints in the development of study designs. Furthermore, it is anticipated that a significant portion of the identified studies will exhibit relatively poor methodological quality and provide only limited generalisable results.

Systematic review registration: This study is registered within PROSPERO (CRD42023412156).

Keywords: ADM; Algorithmic decision-making; Artificial intelligence; Decision support; Healthcare professionals; Patient relevant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akazawa M, Hashimoto K. Prediction of preterm birth using artificial intelligence: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(6):1662–8. 10.1080/01443615.2022.2056828. 10.1080/01443615.2022.2056828 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Araujo T, Helberger N, Kruikemeier S, de Vreese CH. In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Soc. 2020;35:611–23. 10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w. 10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w - DOI
    1. Bahl M, Barzilay R, Yedidia AB, Locascio NJ, Yu L, Lehman CD. High-risk breast lesions: a machine learning model to predict pathologic upgrade and reduce unnecessary surgical excision. Radiology. 2018;286(3):810–8. 10.1148/radiol.2017170549. 10.1148/radiol.2017170549 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brocklehurst P, Field D, Greene K, Juszczak E, Keith R, Kenyon S, et al. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1719–29. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30568-8. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30568-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choudhury A, Asan O. Role of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: systematic literature review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(7):e18599. 10.2196/18599. 10.2196/18599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources