Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 25;1(1):3.
doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2.

The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes

Affiliations
Review

The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes

Max Korbmacher et al. Commun Psychol. .

Abstract

The emergence of large-scale replication projects yielding successful rates substantially lower than expected caused the behavioural, cognitive, and social sciences to experience a so-called 'replication crisis'. In this Perspective, we reframe this 'crisis' through the lens of a credibility revolution, focusing on positive structural, procedural and community-driven changes. Second, we outline a path to expand ongoing advances and improvements. The credibility revolution has been an impetus to several substantive changes which will have a positive, long-term impact on our research environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work is as an initiative from The Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT; https://forrt.org). All authors are advocates of open scholarship with different open science organisational affiliations, including FORRT: M.K., F.A., H.H., M.M.E., A.O.M., B.S., T.K., C.R.P., J.J.S., Y.Y., J.P.R., J.M., S.A., B.J.B., S.G., C.M.O., T.W., S.K.Y., M.L., L.M.K., N.A.A., O.L., T.E., O.R., L.M., K.S. and S.Y. ReproducibiliTEA journal clubs: Y.Y., J.S., C.R.P., M.M.E. and O.L. NASA TOPs: F.A. and S.A. Student Initiative for Open Science: M.K. Open Applied Linguistics: M.L. Psychological Science Accelerator: M.K., F.A., T.K., C.R.P., M.P., K.S., M.E., N.B., B.B., A.O.M., B.G., Y.Y., J.R.P., S.A., S.K.Y., M.L., N.A.A., T.E. and M.M.E. ManyMany: B.G. and M.M.E. ManyBabies: M.M.E. The United Kingdom Reproducibility Network: F.A., C.R.P., T.E., O.R., C.R.P. and A.O.M. Reproducible Research Oxford: O.R. The Sports Science Replication Centre: J.M. Norway’s Reproducibility Network: T.K. and M.K. Interessengruppe Offene und Reproduzierbare Forschung: H.H. Arbeitsgruppe Open Science der Fachgruppe Gesundheitspsychologie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie: L.M.K. Reproducible Interpretable Open Transparent (RIOT) Science Club: T.K. Center for Open Science: S.A. Open Sciency: F.A. and S.A. Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science: F.A. and S.A. Stanford Center for Open and Reproducible Science: S.A.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Modes of change towards scientific credibility.
This figure presents an overview of the three modes of change proposed in this article: structural change is often evoked at the institutional level and expressed by new norms and rules; procedural change refers to behaviours and sets of commonly used practices in the research process; community change encompasses how work and collaboration within the scientific community evolves.

References

    1. Bem, D. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.100, 407 (2011). 10.1037/a0021524 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crocker, J. The road to fraud starts with a single step. Nature479, 151–151 (2011). 10.1038/479151a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D. & Van Der Maas, H. L. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). JPSP. 100, 426–432 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Munafò, M. R. et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hum. Behav.1, 1–9 (2017). 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science349, aac4716 (2015). This study was one of the first large-scale replication projects showing lower replication rates and smaller effect sizes among “successful” replicated findings. 10.1126/science.aac4716 - DOI - PubMed