Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 15;2(1):75.
doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00125-1.

A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society

Affiliations
Review

A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society

Ana-Maria Bliuc et al. Commun Psychol. .

Abstract

We propose a framework integrating insights from computational social science, political, and social psychology to explain how extreme polarization can occur in deeply divided societies. Extreme polarization in a society emerges through a dynamic and complex process where societal, group, and individual factors interact. Dissent at different levels of analysis represents the driver of this process, where societal-level ideological dissent divides society into opposing camps, each with contrasting collective narratives. Within these opposing camps, further dissent leads to the formation of splinter factions and radical cells-sub-groups with increasingly extreme views. At the group level, collective narratives underpinning group identity become more extreme as society fragments. At the individual level, this process involves the internalization of an extreme group narrative and norms sanctioning radical behavior. The intense bonding within these groups and the convergence of personal and group identities through identity fusion increase the likelihood of radical group behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Simulated evolution of an artificial society
The three panels illustrate the phases of polarization (from left to right): the formation of camps, factions, and radical cells.

References

    1. Kubin, E. & Von Sikorski, C. The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc.45, 188–206 (2021).
    1. Schmidt, A. L. et al. Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA114, 3035–3039 (2017). 10.1073/pnas.1617052114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Einav, G. et al. Bursting filter bubbles in a digital age: Opening minds and reducing opinion polarization through digital platforms. Technol. Soc.71, 102136 (2022). Digital platforms that allow exposure to both sides of an argument are shown to increase open-mindedness and reduce opinion polarization. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102136 - DOI
    1. Del Vicario, M. et al. Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Sci. Rep.7, 40391 (2017). 10.1038/srep40391 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Vicario, M. et al. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook. Sci. Rep.6, 37825 (2016). 10.1038/srep37825 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources