Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;44(10):1509-1514.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02108-w. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

Neonatal cardiac POCUS-a survey of academic neonatal centers in the United States

Numra Abdul Aleem  1 , John T Wren Jr  1 , J Lauren Ruoss  2 , Amy H Stanford  1 , Rachael M Hyland  1 , Brady Thomas  1 , Regan E Giesinger  1 , Patrick J McNamara  3
Affiliations

Neonatal cardiac POCUS-a survey of academic neonatal centers in the United States

Numra Abdul Aleem et al. J Perinatol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current state of clinical practice and training regarding the use of cardiac point of care ultrasound (cPOCUS) in neonatal intensive care units.

Study design: An online survey was disseminated through the Association of Academic Directors of Neonatology to appraise clinical usage, infrastructure, and training for cPOCUS. A single response per center was obtained.

Results: Overall survey response rate was 51% (48/94). Of respondents [40/48 (83%)] who reported having a POCUS program, 19/40 (47%) reported performing cPOCUS. In 74% of centers, <10 cPOCUS studies are performed monthly. Only 16% (3/19) of centers had standardized imaging protocols. The most common indication for cPOCUS was central line evaluation. Only 9 (19%) programs reported cPOCUS training, of whom 4 had a formalized process of ongoing competency assessment.

Conclusion: Although use of cPOCUS is increasing, program infrastructure and governance, training, and evaluation vary markedly between institutions and are missing in many. There is an urgent need to develop consensus standards regarding clinical practice and training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nguyen J, Amirnovin R, Ramanathan R, Noori S. The state of point-of-care ultrasonography use and training in neonatal-perinatal medicine and pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs. J Perinatol. 2016;36:972–6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirza HS, Logsdon G, Pulickal A, Stephens M, Wadhawan R. A national survey of neonatologists: barriers and prerequisites to introduce point-of-care ultrasound in neonatal ICUs. Ultrasound Q. 2017;33:265–71. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart DL, Elsayed Y, Fraga MV, Coley BD, Annam A, Milla SS. Use of point-of-care ultrasonography in the NICU for diagnostic and procedural purposes. Pediatrics. 2022;150:e2022060053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV, Yousef N, Cortes RG, Lopez J, et al. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020;24:65. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. McNamara PJ, Barker P, Jain A, Lai WW. Towards use of POCUS to evaluate hemodynamics in critically ill neonates: caution before adoption in this population. Crit Care. 2021;25:92. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources