Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Sep 6;103(36):e39372.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039372.

Safety and efficacy of S1P receptor modulators for the induction and maintenance phases in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Safety and efficacy of S1P receptor modulators for the induction and maintenance phases in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abdullah Akram et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects quality of life. Conventional treatments have had limited success. this study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PrMs) as a potential treatment for IBD.

Methods: We conducted a thorough search of published literature on PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a target population comprising of IBD patients receiving either S1PrMs or placebo and a comparison of the 2. The statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan (version 5.4). Forest plots presented the results as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: A total of 7 RCTs involving 2471 patients were included. The results were reported for both the induction and maintenance phases of treatment. in the induction phase, the intervention group proved to have a significantly higher incidence of histological remission (RR = 2.67; 95% CI [1.97, 3.60]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.06; 95% CI [1.66, 2.56]; P < .00001), clinical remission (RR = 2.23; 95% CI [1.43, 3.46]; P < .0004) and clinical response (RR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.01, 1.84]; P = .04) compared to the placebo group. Outcomes assessed in maintenance phase significantly favored the intervention group over placebo as well, histologic remission (RR = 2.39; 95% CI [1.83, 3.11]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.20; 95% CI [1.28, 3.77]; P = .004), clinical remission (RR = 3.03; 95% CI [1.84, 4.99]; P < .0001), and clinical response (RR = 1.74; 95% CI [1.25, 2.42]; P = .001).

Conclusion: S1PrMs show promising potential for establishing histologic remission, endoscopic improvement, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission. With more studies and clinical trials, these modulators may become a reliable therapeutic choice for UC patients everywhere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews, which included searches of databases and registers only.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Forest plot of clinical remission during the induction phase. (B) Forest plot of histological remission during the induction phase. (C) Forest plot of endoscopic improvement during the induction phase. (D) Forest plot of clinical response during the induction phase. (E) Forest plot of serious adverse events during the induction phase. (F) Forest plot of worsening ulcerative or ulcerative colitis flare-ups during the induction phase. (G) Forest plot of clinical remission during the maintenance phase. (H) Forest plot of endoscopic improvement during the maintenance phase. (I) Forest plot of histological remission during the maintenance phase. CI = confidence interval.

References

    1. Alatab S, Sepanlou SG, Ikuta K, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:17–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee SH, eun Kwon J, Cho ML. Immunological pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res. 2018;16:26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin DT, Ananthakrishnan AN, Siegel CA, Sauer BG, Long MD. ACG clinical guideline: ulcerative colitis in adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:384–413. - PubMed
    1. Porro GB, Cassinotti A, Ferrara E, Maconi G, Ardizzone S. The management of steroid dependency in ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:779–94. - PubMed
    1. Gordon JP, McEwan PC, Maguire A, Sugrue DM, Puelles J. Characterizing unmet medical need and the potential role of new biologic treatment options in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and clinician surveys. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:804–12. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources