Romantic and sexual relationships of young adults born very preterm: An individual participant data meta-analysis
- PMID: 39252537
- DOI: 10.1111/apa.17397
Romantic and sexual relationships of young adults born very preterm: An individual participant data meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: To compare romantic and sexual relationships between adults born very preterm (VP; <32 weeks of gestation) or with very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) and at term, and to evaluate potential biological and environmental explanatory factors among VP/VLBW participants.
Methods: This individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis included longitudinal studies assessing romantic and sexual relationships in adults (mean sample age ≥ 18 years) born VP/VLBW compared with term-born controls. Following PRISMA-IPD guidelines, 11 of the 13 identified cohorts provided IPD from 1606 VP/VLBW adults and 1659 term-born controls. IPD meta-analyses were performed using one-stage approach.
Results: Individuals born VP/VLBW were less likely to be in a romantic relationship (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.31-0.76), to be married/cohabiting (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92), or to have had sexual intercourse (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.36) than term-born adults. If sexually active, VP/VLBW participants were more likely to experience their first sexual intercourse after the age of 18 years (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01) than term-born adults. Among VP/VLBW adults, males, and those with neurosensory impairment were least likely to experience romantic relationships.
Conclusions: These findings reflect less optimal social functioning and may have implications for socioeconomic and health outcomes of adults born VP/VLBW.
© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ. Money, sex and happiness: an empirical study. Scand J Econ. 2004;106(3):393‐415.
-
- Musick K, Bumpass L. Reexamining the case for marriage: union formation and changes in well‐being. J Marriage Fam. 2012;74(1):1‐18.
-
- Waite LJ, Gallagher M. The case for marriage: why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Broadway Books; 2000.
-
- Wang Y, Jiao Y, Nie J, et al. Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all‐cause mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 7,881,040 individuals. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5(1):4.
-
- Robards J, Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Vlachantoni A. Marital status, health and mortality. Maturitas. 2012;73(4):295‐299.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
