Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;14(9):189-193.
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i09.4776.

Bone Preservation in Femoral Intercondylar Box Cut - A Comparative Study between Older and Newer Generation Implants

Affiliations

Bone Preservation in Femoral Intercondylar Box Cut - A Comparative Study between Older and Newer Generation Implants

Haemanath Pandian et al. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the quantity of intercondylar bone removed during femoral box osteotomy for implantation of three contemporary newer generation posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty designs Attune PS (DePuy), Anthem (Smith and Nephews), and NexGen Legacy (Zimmer) with the older version from the same manufacturers.

Materials and methods: We compared the maximum volumetric bone resection required for the housing of the PS mechanism of these six designs. Bone removal by each PS box cutting jig was three-dimensionally measured. The differences between the three designs were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for pairwise comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: The newer generation implants save approximately 33% of bone that was resected from the box cut as compared to the older versions. DePuys Attune PS saved 27.1% bone as compared to Sigma PS resecting 6.96 cm3 of bone, and Zimmers Persona saved 40.57% bone as compared to NexGen from the intercondylar box cut resecting 6.18 cm3. Smith and Nephew s Anthem and Genesis have no difference in their box volume with both resecting 7.8 cm3 of bone.

Conclusion: Irrespective of implant size, the Attune PS (DePuy) and Nexgen Legacy (Zimmer) cutting jigs always resected significantly less bone than did the jigs of older generations. There was no significant difference in the bone removed during femoral box osteotomy in the newer and older generations of Smith and Nephew.

Keywords: Bone resection; box osteotomy; cruciate substituting; newer generation prosthesis; posterior stabilized; total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurements of box cuts obtained from (a) Attune PS, (b) Genesis PS, (c) Anthem PS implants. PS: Posterior stabilized.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Showing box volume comparison of Depuy, Zimmer, and Smith and Nephew implants.

References

    1. Long WJ, Bryce CD, Hollenbeak CS, Benner RW, Scott WN. Total knee replacement in young, active patients:Long-term follow-up and functional outcome:A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e159. - PubMed
    1. Haas SB, Nelson CL, Laskin RS. Posterior stabilized knee arthroplasty:An assessment of bone resection. Knee. 2000;7:25–9.
    1. Indelli PF, Marcucci M, Graceffa A, Charlton S, Latella L. Primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty:Analysis of different instrumentation. J Orthop Surg. 2014;9:54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Bian Y, Feng B, Weng X. Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty:A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147865. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verra W, Van den Boom L, Jacobs W, Clement D, Wymenga A, Nelissen R. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD004803. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources