Ultra-processed foods, allergy outcomes and underlying mechanisms in children: An EAACI task force report
- PMID: 39254357
- DOI: 10.1111/pai.14231
Ultra-processed foods, allergy outcomes and underlying mechanisms in children: An EAACI task force report
Abstract
Background: Consumption of ultra-processed foods [UPFs] may be associated with negative health outcomes. Limited data exist regarding the potential role of UPFs in the occurrence of allergic diseases. The underlying mechanisms underpinning any such associations are also poorly elucidated.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and narrative evidence synthesis of the available literature to assess associations between UPF consumption and pediatric allergy outcomes (n = 26 papers), including data on the association seen with the gut microbiome (n = 16 papers) or immune system (n = 3 papers) structure and function following PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Dietary exposure to fructose, carbonated soft drinks, and sugar intake was associated with an increased risk of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergies in children. Commercial baby food intake was associated with childhood food allergy. Childhood intake of fructose, fruit juices, sugar-sweetened beverages, high carbohydrate UPFs, monosodium glutamate, UPFs, and advanced glycated end-products (AGEs) was associated with the occurrence of allergic diseases. Exposure to UPFs and common ingredients in UPFs seem to be associated with increased occurrence of allergic diseases such as asthma, wheezing, food allergies, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis, in many, but not all studies.
Conclusion: More preclinical and clinical studies are required to better define the link between UPF consumption and the risk of allergies and asthma. These observational studies ideally require supporting data with clearly defined UPF consumption, validated dietary measures, and mechanistic assessments to definitively link UPFs with the risk of allergies and asthma.
Keywords: advanced glycation end products; allergic rhinitis; anti‐foaming; asthma; atopic dermatitis; bulking; carbonating; eczema; emulsifiers; flavor enhancers; foaming; food additives; food allergy; gelling agents; glazing agents; gut barrier; immune system; junk foods; microbiome; monosodium glutamate; preservatives; sweeteners; thickeners.
© 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Chen X, Zhang Z, Yang H, et al. Consumption of ultra‐processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Nutr J. 2020;19(1):86.
-
- Baraldi LG, Martinez Steele E, Canella DS, Monteiro CA. Consumption of ultra‐processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross‐sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020574.
-
- Moubarac JC, Batal M, Louzada ML, Martinez Steele E, Monteiro CA. Consumption of ultra‐processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite. 2017;108:512‐520.
-
- Madruga M, Martínez Steele E, Reynolds C, Levy RB, Rauber F. Trends in food consumption according to the degree of food processing among the UK population over 11 years. Br J Nutr. 2023;130(3):476‐483.
-
- Machado PP, Steele EM, Levy RB, et al. Ultra‐processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non‐communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross‐sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029544.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical