Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Feb;64(1):672-684.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02120-6. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

Religiosity and Health Outcomes in a Cohort of Romanian Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

Affiliations
Observational Study

Religiosity and Health Outcomes in a Cohort of Romanian Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

Stefan Frent et al. J Relig Health. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence for the interrelation between health status and religious beliefs. Our aim was to evaluate the level of religiosity in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and to assess the link between religiosity and measurable health outcomes. This was an observational, single-center study which included patients with moderate-to-severe forms of COVID-19. A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 77 were highly religious (CRS-15 score ≥ 4) and 35 non-highly religious (CRS-15 score < 4). There was no difference in demographics or prevalence of comorbidities between the two groups. Furthermore, we found no difference between groups in radiological extension of lung lesions, length of hospital stays, or ICU need; however, in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in highly religious group (1% vs. 14%, p = 0.005). Serum ferritin level at admission was significantly lower (p = 0.03) and prevalence of post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae significantly higher in highly religious group (p = 0.02).

Keywords: COVID-19; Hospitalization; Mortality; Religiosity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Ethics Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of “Victor Babes” Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology Clinical Hospital Timisoara, Romania (11827/2021). This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

    1. Adeli, S. H., Sekine, M. S., Fatemeh, H., & Mostafa, V. A. (2014). General health and religious coping strategies in patients suffering from Asthma. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics,1(3), 2–9.
    1. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine,25(24), 3186. - PubMed
    1. Blázquez, M., & Sánchez-Mangas, R. (2023). General and COVID19-specific emotional stress: Religious practice as a potential coping strategy. Economics and Human Biology,51(101284), 101284. 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101284 - PubMed
    1. Büssing, A., Michalsen, A., Balzat, H. J., Grünther, R. A., Ostermann, T., Neugebauer, E. A., & Matthiessen, P. F. (2009). Are spirituality and religiosity resources for patients with chronic pain conditions? Pain Medicine,10(2), 327–339. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00572.x - PubMed
    1. Chirico, F., & Nucera, G. (2020). An Italian experience of spirituality from the Coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health,59(5), 2193–2195. 10.1007/s10943-020-01036-1 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources