Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Dec 23;192(1):27-35.
doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae354.

Reflectance confocal microscopy to diagnose malignant melanoma and lentigo maligna in the UK: a single-centre prospective observational trial

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Reflectance confocal microscopy to diagnose malignant melanoma and lentigo maligna in the UK: a single-centre prospective observational trial

Howard P Stevens et al. Br J Dermatol. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Previous work with reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has shown high sensitivity and specificity for malignant melanoma (MM); however, to date, there have been no studies with a UK cohort.

Objectives: To use RCM prospectively to accurately diagnose MM and lentigo maligna (LM) in a private UK secondary care, single-clinician setting; and to assess the potential of RCM to be used as a routine screening procedure.

Methods: In total, 597 patients with a differential clinical diagnosis of MM or LM were consecutively recruited. A sequential record was made of the clinical, dermoscopy and RCM findings by a single dermatologist prior to biopsy. Imaging was done with an arm-mounted confocal microscope unless there was restricted access to a lesion that required a handheld probe. The likelihood of MM was scored for each diagnostic modality, with each diagnosis building on the last. Histology was assessed by a single blinded histopathologist. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03508297).

Results: Altogether, 733 lesions were included in the analysis, including 86 MM and LM (median diameter 7.0 mm). The benign-to-malignant ratio was 3 : 1 (nonmelanocytic malignancies included) and 8.3 : 1 for MM and LM only. The sensitivity and specificity for MM and LM, respectively, was 62.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.7-73.0] and 63.1% (95% CI 59.3-66.8) for clinical examination; 91.9% (95% CI 84.0-96.7) and 42.0% (95% CI 38.1-45.9), respectively, for dermoscopy; and 94.2% (95% CI 87.0-98.1) and 83.0% (95% CI 79.9-85.8), respectively, for RCM. The positive predictive value of RCM in diagnosing MM and LM was 42.4% (95% CI 38.1-46.8) and the negative predictive value was 99.1% (95% CI 97.9-99.6).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that RCM can reliably diagnose MM and is fast enough to be integrated into UK pigmented lesion clinics by dermatologists trained in RCM. The number needed to treat decreased from 3.86 with clinical examination to 2.96 with dermoscopy to 1.30 with RCM.

Plain language summary

Malignant melanoma is a skin cancer that affects around 16 000 people in the UK each year. Malignant melanoma can be dangerous, so it is important to diagnose and remove it as early as possible. Malignant melanomas are difficult to identify because they can look like harmless moles or other harmless lesions. Doctors have to take a small tissue sample or ‘biopsy’ to confirm a diagnosis. It is not unusual for a doctor to take 5, 10 or even 20 samples for every cancer they find. In this study, we investigated whether the use of a microscope called a ‘confocal microscope’, applied directly to the skin, can improve a doctor’s ability to diagnose MM. We included any mole or lesion where there was a chance it could be a melanoma. The doctor evaluated by eye, and then used a special magnifying glass called a ‘dermatoscope’, followed by the confocal microscope. We then took a sample and sent it to the laboratory. While we did not find that the taking of samples could be avoided completely, we did find that the number of samples needed to be taken for each melanoma found could be reduced considerably, from an average of 3.9 down to 1.3. Overall, our findings suggest that the use of confocal microscopy could spare patients unnecessary biopsies. The results from confocal microscopy are instant, which could help to reduce patient worry and avoid repeat visits to the doctor. The use of this microscope may also help reduce pressures on pathology laboratories processing biopsies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding