Image memorability influences memory for where the item was seen but not when
- PMID: 39256320
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01635-3
Image memorability influences memory for where the item was seen but not when
Abstract
Observers can determine whether they have previously seen hundreds of images with more than 80% accuracy. This "massive memory" for WHAT we have seen is accompanied by smaller but still massive memories for WHERE and WHEN the item was seen (spatial & temporal massive memory). Recent studies have shown that certain images are more easily remembered than others (higher "memorability"). Does memorability influence spatial massive memory and temporal massive memory? In two experiments, viewers saw 150 images presented twice in random order. These 300 images were sequentially presented at random locations in a 7 × 7 grid. If an image was categorized as old, observers clicked on the spot in the grid where they thought they had previously seen it. They also noted when they had seen it: Experiment 1-clicking on a timeline; Experiment 2-estimating the trial number when the item first appeared. Replicating prior work, data show that high-memorability images are remembered better than low-memorability images. Interestingly, in both experiments, spatial memory precision was correlated with image memorability, while temporal memory precision did not vary as a function of memorability. Apparently, properties that make images memorable help us remember WHERE but not WHEN those images were presented. The lack of correlation between memorability and temporal memory is, of course, a negative result and should be treated with caution.
Keywords: Long term memory; Memorability; Picture memory; Spatial memory; Temporal memory.
© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: The research and consent process were approved by the Mass General Brigham IRB under Protocol #: 2009P001253. Consent to participate: All participants were adults and gave consent under the procedures in Protocol # 2009P001253, cited above. Consent for publication: The consent process includes consent for publication of deidentified results of the study. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Inclusion and diversity: We support inclusive, diverse, and equitable conduct of research.
References
-
- Bainbridge, W. A. (2020). The resiliency of image memorability: A predictor of memory separate from attention and priming. Neuropsychologia, 141, Article 107408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107408
-
- Bainbridge, W. A., Isola, P., & Oliva, A. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Block, R. A., & Gruber, R. P. (2014). Time perception, attention, and memory: A selective review. Acta Psychologica, 149, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2257–2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Borkin, M., Vo, A., Bylinskii, Z., Isola, P., Sunkavalli, S., Oliva, A., & Pfister, H. (2013). What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources