Pain pathophysiology and pharmacology of cattle: how improved understanding can enhance pain prevention, mitigation, and welfare
- PMID: 39258013
- PMCID: PMC11385012
- DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1396992
Pain pathophysiology and pharmacology of cattle: how improved understanding can enhance pain prevention, mitigation, and welfare
Abstract
Globally, humans rely on cattle for food production; however, there is rising societal concern surrounding the welfare of farm animals. From a young age, cattle raised for dairy and beef production experience pain caused by routine management procedures and common disease conditions. The fundamental mechanisms, nociceptive pathways, and central nervous system structures required for pain perception are highly conserved among mammalian species. However, there are limitations to a comparative approach to pain assessment due to interspecies differences in the expression of pain. The stoicism of prey species may impede pain identification and lead to the assumption that cattle lack pain sensitivity. This highlights the importance of establishing validated bovine-specific indicators of pain-a prerequisite for evidence-based pain assessment and mitigation. Our first objective is to provide an overview of pain pathophysiology to illustrate the importance of targeted analgesia in livestock medicine and the negative welfare outcomes associated with unmitigated pain. This is followed by a review of available analgesics, the regulations governing their use, and barriers to implementation of on-farm pain management. We then investigate the current research undertaken to evaluate the pain response in cattle-a critical aspect of the drug approval process. With an emphasis on emerging research in animal cognition and pain pathology, we conclude by discussing the significant influence that pain has on cattle welfare and areas where further research and modified practices are indicated.
Keywords: analgesia; animal welfare; cattle; cow; pain; pain management.
© 2024 Zoltick, Mann and Coetzee.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- de Lahunta A, Glass E, Kent M. General sensory systems: general proprioception and general somatic afferent. In: de Lahunta A, Glass E, Kent M, editors. Veterinary Neuroanatomy and Clinical Neurology. 4th ed. St. Louis. MO: Saunders Elsevier; (2015). p. 237–56.
-
- Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick CE, Katz LC, LaMantia AS, McNamara JO, et al. Nociceptors. In: Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick CE, Katz LC, LaMantia A-S JOM, editors. Neuroscience. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. (2001). p. 209–22.
-
- Weary DM, Niel L, Flower FC, Fraser D. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2006) 100(1–2):64–76. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.013 - DOI
-
- Marquette GA, Ronan S, Earley B. Calf disbudding—animal welfare considerations. J Appl Anim Res. (2023) 51(1):616–23. 10.1080/09712119.2023.2264912 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
